[OSGeo-Discuss] Recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing capability?

[Bruce Bannerman]

Hi Paolo, Markus, Tom and Till,

You have provided some good links there that will be sufficient for my
immediate need.

Many thanks for your help.


@Markus,

Your spreadsheet comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that it
will take a lot of effort to keep it current.

Is this something that projects are doing currently?


Bruce



On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Bruce Bannerman <B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au>
wrote:

>
>
> On 13/05/2016, 16:08, "Discuss on behalf of Paolo Cavallini"
> <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of cavallini at faunalia.it>
> wrote:
>
> >Il 12/05/2016 23:57, Bruce Bannerman ha scritto:
> >> Has anyone done a recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing
> >> capability?
> >>
> >> It would be interesting to see where we stand now with FOSS4G software
> >> functionality.
> >>
> >> It appears that this is what ESRI is using to compare the functionality
> >> of their various license levels:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://esriaustralia.com.au/u/lib/cms/arcgis1021-desktop-functionality-m
> >>atrix.pdf
> >>
> >> Is there something comparable (that also refers to additional capability
> >> that is offered via OS?
> >
> >Hi Bruce,
> >previous attempts proved difficult, as a proper comparison involves a
> >lot of work. The ESRI document seems a good starting point. Unsure we
> >would be allowed to reuse it.
> >Would you be willing to help filling up the table for some free GIS?
> >All the best.
> >
> >--
> >Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> >QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discuss mailing list
> >Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> >http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160517/c4775104/attachment-0002.html>