[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo website/rebranding May Update
Jody Garnett
jody.garnett at gmail.com
Sat Jun 10 16:34:54 PDT 2017
Suchith Is there any answer to my question on the number of organizations
that have provided an open source report card? While I wrote one for
boundless I am not sure I have seen any others.
For listing service providers I would like to avoid putting organizations
in the position of ranking their own participation (a weakness with the
report card approach). When listing service providers we are following the
"core contributors" and "contributors" model used by qgis and geoserver -
so the project steering committee will be the only ones in position to
influence listing order.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:32 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
> That is a good idea, we will list it as a "resource" (you can see some
> examples of resources already on there).
>
> We can try and add it, but I am concerned your feedback needed to be in
> last month as we have reviewed the final site map. Adding it as a resource
> would not disrupt the site map.
>
> How many companies/organizations have done open source report cards?
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:38 PM Suchith Anand <
> Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> For our new website, i would also like to have a section and webform for
>> publishing data on annual Open Source Report Card for organisations [1]. We
>> had some discussions last year on this and it is important to make sure we
>> have this done for the new website. This will also help us to atleast
>> partially try to quantify the economic impact of Open Source Geospatial
>> software
>>
>>
>> Jody - many I request you to please have the webform for publishing data
>> on annual Open Source Report Card for organisations as part of the updates
>> for our website. Thanks.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/2016/11/volunteers-needed-for-producing-a-simple-webform-and-website-for-publishing-data-on-annual-open-source-report-card-for-organisations/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Discuss <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of SERGIO
>> ACOSTAYLARA <sergio.acostaylara at mtop.gub.uy>
>> Sent: 06 June 2017 1:52 PM
>> To: Jody Garnett; OSGeo Discussions
>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo website/rebranding May Update
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the news. There are some changes we need to make to the new
>> GeoForAll website regarding its Regional and Thematic groups. How should we
>> proceed?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>> Sergio Acosta y Lara
>> Departamento de Geomática
>> Dirección Nacional de Topografía
>> Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas
>> URUGUAY
>> (598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330
>> http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/
>> ________________________________
>> De: Discuss <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> en nombre de Jody Garnett <
>> jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>> Enviado: martes, 30 de mayo de 2017 11:42
>> Para: OSGeo Discussions
>> Asunto: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo website/rebranding May Update
>>
>> Marketing committee reporting in with an OSGeo website/rebranding May
>> Update<http://www.osgeo.org/marketing/rebranding/may.html>:
>>
>>
>> Check out the blog post for:
>>
>> * A new look for OSGeo
>> * Branding and Collateral
>> * Website Content and Wireframes
>>
>> This initiative is funded by OSGeo with the help of sponsorship - thanks
>> to our key sponsors GeoCat and Boundless for making this possible.
>>
>> Thanks to Peter, Helena and others who responded to our call for
>> volunteers in April.
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>>
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
--
--
Jody Garnett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170610/c51e88e5/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list