[OSGeo-Discuss] (no subject)

Steven Feldman shfeldman at gmail.com
Sun Mar 26 10:29:34 PDT 2017 

Suchith

You mention "high cost of GIS software procurement for governments”. I am not sure how you are measuring this “high” cost and against what? For most local government bodies (in the developed world) I would expect the cost of GI software to be 0.1% to 0.2% of total budget and less for a central government department. I don’t consider this to be “high” but of course as taxpayers many of us would like expenditure to be lower whether it is on software or people or ...

My experience of procurement is based on the UK but probably applies to much of Europe. All but the smallest procurements are governed by EU regulations and are pretty testing for vendors (regardless of whether they offer proprietary or open source solutions) and have a high degree of transparency and fairness. Typically cost will be one of the two main criteria on which bids are evaluated, the other being quality.

The gvSIG community is impressive, on what do you base "created  thousands of  jobs”? That is more than I estimated for the whole FOSS4G ecosystem last year. 

I agree that in circumstances where an organisation wants to deploy thousands of desktops, an open source GI desktop may well save money compared to the cost of a proprietary licensed product particularly if the organisation can provide training and support from internal resources. This could be the case in the education sector. But, and this is a big but most government departments are moving away from desktop GI to server based solutions and in those circumstances the costs of implementation, integration, support and hosting will substantially exceed any costs of licenses.

I spend much of my working time advocating and marketing open source GI and, in the past, I have also built a very successful business based on proprietary software. The choices that customers make are based on a wide range of criteria, there is no one right choice and it is a misunderstanding of sophisticated buyers to suggest that they have in some way been mislead by vendors whether they are proprietary or open source.

Let’s grow the usage of Open Source GI through positive advocacy of its benefits, investment of time and money in high quality marketing and an understanding of and respect for the strengths of our competitors.

Best
______
Steven


> On 26 Mar 2017, at 07:53, Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Steven,
> 
> Thank you for your email and information.  I am an educator and researcher. I  have zero knowledge or expertise in software sales or software procurement  .I do not know the answers but i am sure by harnessing the collective wisdom of the community we will be able find the best ideas  for bringing down high cost of GIS software procurement for governments for cost savings of tax payer money and create innovation opportunities for all.
> 
> There needs to be detailed study on how we can bring down high GIS software costs  for govenments worldwide . Governments are are one of the biggest spenders and it is all hardworking taxpayers money from cleaners to teachers, hence it is important to think of cost savings . My gut feeling is if there are open and transparent procurement systems and lot of competition (no vendor monopolies), then GIS software implementation costs will come down and also create lot of innovation and value added opportunities for big companies as well as SMEs. There need to be best practice sharing  globally. For example i  am interested to understand more about  gvSIG ecosystem[1] in Spain and other similar examples . gvSIG didn't create any Billionaires or multi Billionaires (that was not its purpose) but it did create lot of innovation  , helped  local governments , created  thousands of  jobs and a vibrant ecosystem and community. More importanly for me, it helped create gvSIG Batovi which went on to provide high quality spatial education opportunities for millions of poor students in Uruguay and other countries.
> 
> I know good examples of large scale IT projects done with low cost in my state Kerala in India ( we are a developing country with lot of resource constraints ). For example IT at School project [1]  (which is World’s largest simultaneous deployment of FOSS based ICT education). It is running for over a decade now benifitting over 12,000 schools,  about 60 lakh students, 6 million students and 200000 teachers.There are costs for implementation, customisation (we have local language- Malayalam), integration, training, ongoing support, maintenance and it is all done locally and innovation ecosystems have been created locally.   More importantly we can scale this up easily to millions of schools as needed and there is no fear of vendor lock -in. Thank God that major software vendors or sellers  didn't get involved in this! 
> 
> So as i told my knowledge in this is very limited, so i am depending on experts like you to help guide me.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Suchith
> 
> [1] http://www.gvsig.com/ <http://www.gvsig.com/>
> 
> [2] https://itschool.gov.in/glance.php <https://itschool.gov.in/glance.php> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Discuss <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>>
> Sent: 25 March 2017 5:06 PM
> To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] (no subject)
> 
> It is important to note that the cost of licences in a solution (i.e. something more than a simple desktop implementation) are only a part of the overall cost and in many cases, in my experience, a small part.
> 
> Implementation, customisation, integration, training, ongoing support, maintenance and hosting are the main costs regardless of whether the underlying software is proprietary or open source
> 
> My experience of selling to the public sector is that, on occasions, proprietary solutions have been lower cost than open source.
> 
> Steven
> 
> 
> > On 24 Mar 2017, at 19:00, discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
> >    discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >    discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org>
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >    discuss-owner at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-owner at lists.osgeo.org>
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >      properitery product as Open ? (Suchith Anand)
> >   2. Re: Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for
> >      update (Vicky Vergara)
> >   3. Ideas for the building global research agenda for Geospatial
> >      Data Science (Suchith Anand)
> >   4. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >      properitery product as Open? (Steven Feldman)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:51:53 +0000
> > From: Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>
> > To: María Arias de Reyna <delawen+osgeo at gmail.com <mailto:delawen+osgeo at gmail.com>>, Luí­s Moreira
> >    de Sousa <luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch <mailto:luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>>
> > Cc: "discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor
> >    to market thier properitery product as Open ?
> > Message-ID:
> >    <HE1PR0602MB2793CA6DC465343184D8EAAC873F0 at HE1PR0602MB2793.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com <mailto:HE1PR0602MB2793CA6DC465343184D8EAAC873F0 at HE1PR0602MB2793.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > +1 .
> >
> >
> > I am also interested in how we can protect taxpayers money in this. The need for cost savings by using Open source GIS software will help the local authorities and various government departments across Europe in reducing huge licence fee costs for proprietary software and  Government and taxpayers as a whole will benefit from cost efficiencies, reduce the cost of lock-in to suppliers and products. This is especially important for future IT investments (for example Cloud Computing) , so that more options are explored and choices available. I presented my ideas on the importance of having a National level strategy for Open Principles in Geospatial [1] . Overview slides are at https://www.slideshare.net/SuchithAnand/national-level-strategy-for-open-principles-in-geospatial <https://www.slideshare.net/SuchithAnand/national-level-strategy-for-open-principles-in-geospatial>
> >
> >
> >
> > It is my duty as a global citizen to work on this  so that all our future generations are empowered fully. Let us plan to meet and discuss ideas at FOSS4G -Europe for making OSGeo European chapter.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Suchith
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/2016/03/national-level-strategy-for-open-principles-in-geospatial-ideas-and-inputs-needed/ <http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/2016/03/national-level-strategy-for-open-principles-in-geospatial-ideas-and-inputs-needed/>
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Discuss <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of María Arias de Reyna <delawen+osgeo at gmail.com <mailto:delawen+osgeo at gmail.com>>
> > Sent: 23 March 2017 9:20 AM
> > To: Luí­s Moreira de Sousa
> > Cc: discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Luí­s Moreira de Sousa <luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch <mailto:luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch><mailto:luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch <mailto:luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>>> wrote:
> >
> > I believe we need a regulatory framework for "open source" labelling; something like the EU regulation 1169/2011 [2] for organic farming. It not only sets the criteria for farmers to label their products, as it actively prevents others from falsely claiming to that criteria.
> >
> >
> > +1 Restarting the movement for the european chapter to be able to lobby for this...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
> >
> > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> > message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> > University of Nottingham.
> >
> > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> > permitted by UK legislation.
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170323/b5c26dd4/attachment-0001.html <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170323/b5c26dd4/attachment-0001.html>>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:12:47 -0600
> > From: Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de>>
> > To: OSGeo Discuss list <discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo
> >    - call for update
> > Message-ID:
> >    <CAK_FzuVEcFLgyxKiML8-qOeNv7fAYJfN1KF2at0svANQiXCMyA at mail.gmail.com <mailto:CAK_FzuVEcFLgyxKiML8-qOeNv7fAYJfN1KF2at0svANQiXCMyA at mail.gmail.com>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Added a line for pgRouting
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Greatly insightful slide deck from Maxi about Open principles in
> >> general and OSGeo in particular. Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >> Cameron
> >>
> >> On 22/3/17 4:02 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >>
> >> That is a *great* talk, and shows a lot of areas where we can improve.
> >>
> >> There has been a consistent call for "incubation" to continue to hold
> >> projects accountable to OSGeo standards. I have resisted these calls as I
> >> view incubation as an outreach activity - part of our mission to promote
> >> open/transparent software development.
> >>
> >> Still that is great to have an external review; is that review public?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jody Garnett
> >>
> >> On 21 March 2017 at 01:18, Venkatesh Raghavan <
> >> raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp <mailto:raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maxi also made an excelling presentation on related topic
> >>> at FOSS4G-Asia 2017. The presentation is available at
> >>>
> >>> http://www.slideshare.net/cannata/massimiliano-cannata-keyno <http://www.slideshare.net/cannata/massimiliano-cannata-keyno>
> >>> te-foss4gasia-2017
> >>>
> >>> Best
> >>>
> >>> Venka
> >>>
> >>>> On 2017/03/20 22:08, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually Maxi and I did a recent thorough research into OSGeo project
> >>>> use of infrastructure, by each project, and it was published as a paper (or
> >>>> soon to be).  In the short term I know Maxi has submitted it as a talk for
> >>>> FOSS4G-Europe.  It's good to take a step back and review old processes.
> >>>> Actually we hope that that was a start of a regular OSGeo project 'health
> >>>> checkup', which obviously is very needed.  For example, it was quite
> >>>> shocking how many current OSGeo projects are functioning without any
> >>>> regular Project Steering Committee meetings, or even a visible Project
> >>>> Steering Committee.  I am sure Maxi will be sharing those results at
> >>>> FOSS4G-E.
> >>>>
> >>>> -jeff
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Discuss mailing list
> >>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing listDiscuss at lists.osgeo.orghttps <mailto:listDiscuss at lists.osgeo.orghttps>://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cameron Shorter
> >> M +61 419 142 254
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> > Salzmannstraße 44,
> > 81739 München, Germany
> >
> > Vicky Vergara
> > Operations Research
> >
> > eMail: vicky at georepublic.de <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de>
> > Web: https://georepublic.info <https://georepublic.info/>
> >
> > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
> > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
> >
> > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
> > CEO: Daniel Kastl
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170323/1a31400c/attachment-0001.html <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170323/1a31400c/attachment-0001.html>>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:05:12 +0000
> > From: Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>
> > To: "discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>>,
> >    "geoforall at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geoforall at lists.osgeo.org>" <geoforall at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geoforall at lists.osgeo.org>>
> > Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Ideas for the building global research agenda
> >    for Geospatial Data Science
> > Message-ID:
> >    <HE1PR0602MB279314835A1757DE8B5ADD1D873E0 at HE1PR0602MB2793.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com <mailto:HE1PR0602MB279314835A1757DE8B5ADD1D873E0 at HE1PR0602MB2793.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Dear colleague,
> >
> > The Geospatial IG of the Research Data Alliance will be meeting in Barcelona on 5th April 2017 to keep building ideas for the global research agenda for Geospatial Data Science.I am pleased to send the final meeting agenda and invite all interested to join.
> >
> > The meeting objectives are to :
> >
> > * Discussions on Geospatial Data Science - Vision 2030 [1]
> > * Plan next steps from OpenCitySmart and UrbanGeoBigData [2]
> >
> > * Ideas for Education programs for Geospatial Data Science
> >
> > * Discuss Ideas for starting new WGs in Transport Data
> >
> > Meeting agenda
> >
> > This meeting aims to build upon our previous meetings and draft agenda below
> >
> > * Updates on Geospatial IG - Suchith Anand (GODAN/University of Nottingham)
> > * Discussions on new WG in Transport Data that is in progress - Beth Zeitler (Millennium Challenge Corporation, USA)
> > * Coverage: Standards for Big Earth Data - Peter Baumann (Jacobs University)
> > * Enabling the re-use of spatial information across domains - Andrea Perego (JRC, European Commission)
> > * Copernicus EU Programme - Andrea Perego (JRC, European Commission)
> > * Joint W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web WG - Andrea Perego (JRC, European Commission)
> > * Discussions on Geospatial Data Science - Vision 2030 - chaired by Suchith Anand (GODAN/University of Nottingham)
> > * The Rise of OpenStreetMap as a World Mapping Agency [3] - discussions chaired by Suchith Anand (GODAN/University of Nottingham)
> > * NASA Europa Challenge 2017 and OpenCitySmart updates - Suchith Anand (GODAN/University of Nottingham)
> >
> > * Updates on Capacity Development from IGAD meeting - Suchith Anand (GODAN/University of Nottingham)
> >
> > * Ideas/updates on Training programs for Geospatial Data Science - All
> > * Ideas for specific actions /new WGs in Geospatial IG - All
> >
> > There will be gotomeeting facility for those interested to join remotely. I am waiting for the RDA hosts to send me the details of this and it will updated in the main website at
> > https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-geospatial-rda-9th-plenary-meeting <https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-geospatial-rda-9th-plenary-meeting>
> >
> > I look forward to welcome you all for productive discussions and actions for building  the global research agenda for Geospatial Data Science.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Suchith
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.geoconnexion.com/uploads/publication_pdfs/uk_v15i18-058-059-Op951AF3.pdf <http://www.geoconnexion.com/uploads/publication_pdfs/uk_v15i18-058-059-Op951AF3.pdf>
> >
> > [2] https://www.devex.com/news/how-nasa-and-the-un-are-using-location-intelligence-to-build-smart-cities-in-developing-countries-89721 <https://www.devex.com/news/how-nasa-and-the-un-are-using-location-intelligence-to-build-smart-cities-in-developing-countries-89721>
> > [3] http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/2017/03/the-rise-of-openstreetmap-as-a-world-mapping-agency/ <http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/2017/03/the-rise-of-openstreetmap-as-a-world-mapping-agency/>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
> >
> > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> > message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> > University of Nottingham.
> >
> > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> > permitted by UK legislation.
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170324/bcb9f2fe/attachment-0001.html <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170324/bcb9f2fe/attachment-0001.html>>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:48:20 +0000
> > From: Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>>
> > To: OSGeo Discussions <discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor
> >    to market thier properitery product as Open?
> > Message-ID: <DA3DA905-6C65-4D42-A9F9-5132F9F7845C at gmail.com <mailto:DA3DA905-6C65-4D42-A9F9-5132F9F7845C at gmail.com>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > I wanted to respond to Suchith’s query but I found the strength and length of my thoughts to be too much to include in an email. I was also keen to share them with a wider audience than the regulars on this list.
> >
> > So if you are interested in my views on the use of the adjective ‘open’ you can read my post on "Esri isn’t evil” at http://knowwhereconsulting.co.uk/blog/esri-isnt-evil/ <http://knowwhereconsulting.co.uk/blog/esri-isnt-evil/> <http://knowwhereconsulting.co.uk/blog/esri-isnt-evil/ <http://knowwhereconsulting.co.uk/blog/esri-isnt-evil/>>
> >
> > Feel free to rant at me in the comments section of my blog or back her on the list
> >
> > May the FOSS be with you
> > ______
> > Steven
> >
> >
> >> On 23 Mar 2017, at 19:00, board-request at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:board-request at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
> >>    discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>    discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-request at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>    discuss-owner at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss-owner at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>  1. Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (Suchith Anand)
> >>  2. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (Jody Garnett)
> >>  3. Re: Is it possible for proprietary GIS vendor to market their
> >>     proprietary product as Open ? (Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX))
> >>  4. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to    market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (Kiringai Kamau)
> >>  5. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (María Arias de Reyna)
> >>  6. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (María Arias de Reyna)
> >>  7. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (María Arias de Reyna)
> >>  8. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to    market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (Luí­s Moreira de Sousa)
> >>  9. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (María Arias de Reyna)
> >> 10. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (James Klassen)
> >> 11. Re: Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier
> >>     properitery product as Open ? (Jody Garnett)
> >> 12. Re: GRASS GIS video from 1987: 30th anniversary    blog post /
> >>     link (Jeff McKenna)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:15:27 +0000
> >> From: Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>
> >> To: "discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>>,
> >>    "geoforall at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geoforall at lists.osgeo.org>" <geoforall at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geoforall at lists.osgeo.org>>
> >> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to
> >>    market thier properitery product as Open ?
> >> Message-ID:
> >>    <HE1PR0602MB2793B630B2ED4BC6B9032C66873C0 at HE1PR0602MB2793.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com <mailto:HE1PR0602MB2793B630B2ED4BC6B9032C66873C0 at HE1PR0602MB2793.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>>
> >>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a query. If a properitery GIS vendor starts marketing thier properitery products as Open platform and software then what rights do the organisations and customers have who are mislead buying the  properitery software thinking it is open have ?  The definision of Proprietary software [1] is very clearly defined, so  how can it be possible for any properitery GIS vendor to market their  software knowingly as open platform if it is properitery?
> >>
> >>
> >> This also greatly affects the business and revenues of true open source software companies .  Who is responsible for any misleading marketing that results in losses to both customers who are mislead to buy the properitery software thinking it is open  and also to other companies who do true open source business who lose out on the business opportunities? Is it right business ethics to do this?
> >>
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >>
> >> Suchith
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170324/be45add5/attachment-0001.html <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170324/be45add5/attachment-0001.html>>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of Discuss Digest, Vol 123, Issue 22
> > ****************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 
> 
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
> 
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20170326/d1dd2829/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Discuss mailing list