[OSGeo-Discuss] Code of Conduct... followup to avoid lobbies
MarĂa Arias de Reyna
delawen at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 01:08:03 PST 2018
Hi,
I think that more than in the CoC, that should be on the member nomination.
And yes, it makes sense. Can you propose a change on the membership
procedure so the board can vote on this? We have some phrase about taking
over OSGeo, maybe we can rephrase that.
Although it is also true that people I know better and I can nominate with
more arguments are usually people I work with. Either if it is working on
the community or in a company, that's just usually a coincidence. But if
they are good enough, I can suggest external people to nominate them, sure.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:04 AM Luigi Pirelli <luipir at gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't find a rule (in code of conduct) or election rules about charter
> member nomination...
>
> I wouldn't like to see nomination of a member from another member
> belonging to the same company. It could be a mechanism to create lobbies.
>
> any opinion?
>
> Luigi Pirelli
>
>
> **************************************************************************************************
> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
> * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
> *
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
> * Hire me: http://goo.gl/BYRQKg
>
> **************************************************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20181211/8010cd16/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list