[OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Standards] Spare OGC membership slot

Suchith Anand Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk
Wed Feb 20 23:31:06 PST 2019


May I also request that  OSGeo representatives who take up these slots to please also take some time to share OSGeo events updates and information in the OGC maillists to help build wider collaborations/synergies. As part of  the OSGeo-OGC MoU , they can share key OSGeo events (FOSS4G conferences etc) to the OGC maillists etc. So please respond to this call for volunteers request if you are interested. Thanks.


Best wishes,


Suchith



________________________________
From: Discuss <discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
Sent: 20 February 2019 19:37
To: standards at lists.osgeo.org; OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Standards] Spare OGC membership slot


I'm looping Scott's comments (from the OGC) into the general OGC discussion forum, as I think there are others who might be interested.

I'll add that you should plan to dedicate a lot of time if you intend to partake in OGC initiatives. The OGC tackles hard interoperability problems and you will likely need to think and discuss deeply with like minded people. It is hard work, but it can be very satisfying and rewarding to be working on the bleeding edge of technology (as many open source developers are doing already).

Warm regards, Cameron

On 19/2/19 7:52 pm, Scott Serich wrote:
Hi Jonathan (and anybody else listening). Something that might be attractive to providers of open-source offerings is the opportunity to participate in OGC testbeds and other initiatives. Any OGC member who's interested might consider the following:

1. Sign up as an Observer for the OGC Testbed-15 initiative to learn how they work.
2. Plan on submitting a bid in early 2020 to implement new offerings as part of OGC Testbed-16.
3. Selected bidders will become participants to receive cost-share funds to help offset the cost of developing testbed component implementations.
4. These participants will retain full control over the source code assets. All that must be delivered are interoperability demonstrations showing how the work helps advance the OGC standards baseline.

Under current testbed policies, OGC does not take possession of any of the developed source code. So in some sense, this is a roundabout way to get "paid" to develop open-source code. It's generally not sufficient funds to enable full cost recovery. But if the alternative is to receive no funding at all, this might present an attractive option.

Contact me or visit "https://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/active"<https://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/active> if you're interested in learning more. Full observer privileges are available to all OGC members (including the OSGeo slot).

Thanks.
-Scott


=====

Scott Serich, Ph.D., JD

Director, Innovation Programs, Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

+1 (703) 283-3432<callto:+1%20%28703%29%20283-3432>

sserich at opengeospatial.org<mailto:sserich at opengeospatial.org>
Skype: scott.serich.ogc

The OGC: Making Location Count.

www.opengeospatial.org<http://www.opengeospatial.org>

=====

________________________________
From: "Bruce Bannerman" <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com><mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>
To: standards at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:standards at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 10:21:02 PM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Standards] Spare OGC membership slot

Hi Jonathon,

Are you still interested in taking up an OSGeo membership slot within OGC.

It will give you a private membership that you will be able to use to participate within various OGC working groups and access member only OGC content.

If so, then I suggest that you use the membership slot to see how you can best contribute your skills to benefit both organisations.

I request that you provide updates to this list, at least yearly, but ideally when you come across items that you believe will be of interest to the OSGeo community.

You’ll find a wealth of resources on the OGC web site:

https://www.opengeospatial.org/

Kind regards,

Bruce



On 12 Feb 2019, at 02:17, Jonathan Moules <jonathan-lists at lightpear.com<mailto:jonathan-lists at lightpear.com>> wrote:


Hi Bruce,

I might be. It depends what it entails etc, and what value it would bring to OSGeo.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On 2019-02-10 23:58, Bruce Bannerman wrote:
Hi everyone,

Do we have anyone on the Standards List who has an interest in filling our spare
OGC Individual Membership slot?

I’m just after an expression of interest at this stage, to see if a selection process is required.

If you are interested, please indicate so by simply replying to this email and stating so by the 18th Feb GMT.


Kind regards,

Bruce



Begin forwarded message:

From: Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com<mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: OGC membership for Angelos Tzotsos and Jáchym Cepicky
Date: 2 February 2019 at 08:21:36 AEDT
To: bsherman at opengeospatial.org<mailto:bsherman at opengeospatial.org>
Cc: standards at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:standards at lists.osgeo.org>

Hi Barbara,

We will renew Angelos’ membership.

I will need to initiate a process to fill Jachym’s now vacant membership.

Kind regards,

Bruce

On 1 Feb 2019, at 22:35, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Bruce and all,

there is nothing I could report - my slot currently  at sleeping mode
and (I offered it in the past) available for someone more active

If anybody needs this, please step ahead and take over

thanks

Jachym

čt 31. 1. 2019 v 21:13 odesílatel Bruce Bannerman
<bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com<mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>> napsal:

Hi Jachym,

I think that you may have missed this email.

Can you please respond by next Friday, the 8th Feb?

Regards,

Bruce

On 18 Jan 2019, at 07:45, Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com<mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>> wrote:

@ Angelos and Jachym,

Before we renew your membership, can you please provide a brief report on the value of your OGC Membership.

I’d like to understand both the value that you have contributed to the OGC and the value that you have in turn received on behalf of OSGeo.

Kind regards,

Bruce



Begin forwarded message:

From: Barbara Sherman <bsherman at opengeospatial.org<mailto:bsherman at opengeospatial.org>>
Date: 18 January 2019 at 07:09:40 AEDT
To: Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com<mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>>, Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com<mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>>
Subject: OGC membership for Angelos Tzotsos and Jáchym Cepicky

Hi Jeff and Bruce,

Jáchym's OGC membership is due to be renewed on 1 March 2019 and Angelos' is due to renew on 1 April 2019.  Do you want to continue to offer them OSGeo slots?

Barbara

--
*****************
Barbara L. Sherman
Systems Manager/Membership Relations
Open Geospatial Consortium
35 Main Street, Suite 5
Wayland, MA 01778
Voice:  +1 508 647 9385
Fax:  +1 508 655 2237
bsherman at opengeospatial.org<mailto:bsherman at opengeospatial.org>
******************

The OGC: Making location count.
http://www.opengeospatial.org



--
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp




_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Standards at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Standards at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Standards at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Standards at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Standards at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Standards at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards




_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Standards at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Standards at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards

--
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier
Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant

M +61 (0) 419 142 254



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment. 

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
where permitted by law.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190221/3adbfdbc/attachment.html>


More information about the Discuss mailing list