[OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
Jody Garnett
jody.garnett at gmail.com
Sun Jan 27 10:50:36 PST 2019
Your feedback makes me think we should hide entries that don’t have a
photo.
My thinking is part of the point of the website is to show that open source
is made by people. Pages and pages of placeholder photos make us look like
the faceless mob that protential adopters are told to fear to trust.
Would rather fewer people with real faces from an outreach standpoint.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:50 AM Tom Chadwin <tom.chadwin at nnpa.org.uk> wrote:
> Disagree with Barry - I do like it. However, I do think the high-contrast
> design means the placeholders can overpower the actual photos. I would
> definitely knock back the darkness of the background colour, and probably
> knock back the whole thing a fair bit. I'm thinking that the palette should
> reflect a disabled icon or menu item in a GUI, so be faded. Other than
> that, I really like it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Barry
> > Rowlingson
> > Sent: 22 January 2019 08:36
> > To: Vicky Vergara
> > Cc: OSGeo Discuss list
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gender neutral default image on webpage
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:53 AM Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all
> > > I made a gender neutral default image representing an OSGeo member.
> > > Hope you like it.
> >
> > Not sure I do like it! The head is so large compared to the body, and
> > the body so devoid of feature I don't immediately read it as an
> > abstract human representation. I'm almost reading it as a lower-case
> > 'i'. Plus the logo is ever so slightly off-center from the circle
> > which is triggering my OCD tendencies a bit.
> >
> > Maybe if the body was a bit larger and connected to the head. It is a
> > very bold and high-contrast design, and appears very large on the page
> > so the overall impact is quite massive. Maybe if the icons were
> > smaller it wouldn't matter so much, but as the page is currently my
> > browser shows only four people on a screen at once, and most of that
> > is avatars and fairly empty squares with names in. Sorry if I've
> > drifted off topic into the web page design now....
> >
> > Happy to tweak it a bit if you've got an Inkscape SVG to share.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> >
> >
> > > On this page
> > > https://www.osgeo.org/community/members/
> > > The image is shown when the member does not have an libavatar . (work
> > in progress, on displaying the uploaded image on this page)
> > >
> > > On the profile page, the
> > > libavatar takes precedence
> > > if not found then uploaded image
> > > if not found then the default image is used
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Vicky
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> > > Salzmannstraße 44,
> > > 81739 München, Germany
> > >
> > > Vicky Vergara
> > > Operations Research
> > >
> > > eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
> > > Web: https://georepublic.info
> > >
> > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
> > > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
> > >
> > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
> > > CEO: Daniel Kastl
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> Tom Chadwin, ICT Manager
> Telephone: 01434 611530 Mob:
> Web: www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk<
> http://www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk/>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE - Disclaimer - This communication is from Northumberland
> National Park Authority (NNPA).The Authority’s head office and principal
> place of business is Eastburn, South Park, Hexham, Northumberland, NE46
> 1BS, United Kingdom. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
> that any form of disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this
> communication or the information in it or in any attachments is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it. Any views or
> opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of NNPA.Contractors or potential contractors are reminded
> that a formal Order or Contract is needed for NNPA to be bound by any offer
> or acceptance of terms for the supply of goods or services Although this
> email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defects which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are
> received, no responsibility is accepted by the NNPA for any loss or damage
> arising in any way from the receipt or use thereof. Computer systems of
> this Authority may be monitored and communications carried out on them
> recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other
> lawful purpose.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
--
Jody Garnett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190127/d8c00572/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list