[OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Standards] WFS 3.0 and SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog sprint in Colorado

Scott Simmons ssimmons at opengeospatial.org
Fri May 3 05:55:34 PDT 2019

Hi Stefan,

I can talk to WFS3. We now have a roadmap for all OGC candidate standards under development (not fully populated, but those closest to approval and a few others are in the roadmap):
http://www.opengeospatial.org/roadmap <http://www.opengeospatial.org/roadmap>

This roadmap will be more formally promoted in the coming weeks once we get it fully populated.

WFS3 (now being referred to as OGC API Features) is to be briefed to both ISO / TC 211 and OGC in June in advance of approval voting in each organization. No guarantees, but the OGC approval is forecast to occur after our June Technical Committee Meeting (24-27 June) in Leuven, Belgium. Voting takes about 2 months in total.

Best Regards,

Scott Simmons
Chief Operations Officer
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
tel +1 970 682 1922
mob +1 970 214 9467
ssimmons at opengeospatial.org <mailto:ssimmons at opengeospatial.org>

The OGC: Making Location Count…
www.opengeospatial.org <http://www.opengeospatial.org/>

> On May 3, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris
> Let me chime in here with two specific question about my understanding
> of WFS3 and of STAC..
> A. When will WFS3 become an OGC standard? Is there a road a map? (I
> know about the London Hackathon mid year)
> B. What is the relationship of STAC with Catalog Service for Web
> (CS-W) and metadata (schema.org) in general?
> :Stefan
> Am Do., 1. März 2018 um 14:33 Uhr schrieb Angelos Tzotsos
> <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>:
>> Thank you Chris for the information.
>> Best regards,
>> Angelos
>> On 03/01/2018 02:17 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>>> Just realized I forgot to reply to this, but that's a great idea. I'll be
>>> in Orleans for the OGC meetings, so will be on the same time zone. And
>>> there's definitely some STAC collaborators who will be in Bonn.
>>> Note also that we're organizing a remote participation option for next
>>> week. GeoSolutions is going to be working on implementing WFS 3 in
>>> GeoServer and Even Rouault is going to be looking in to GDAL bindings for
>>> WFS 3.0 and STAC. Would be great for others in Europe to work on OSGeo
>>> projects while we're working away in Ft. Collins. Obviously any WFS 3 /
>>> STAC implementation & spec feedback in the next few weeks would be great,
>>> but we're hoping to be able to show lots of diverse progress next week.
>>> For more info see
>>> https://medium.com/@cholmes/participate-remotely-in-the-wfs-hackathon-next-week-d11a99eb510b
>>> and please sign up to participate at https://goo.gl/forms/v8hyeJvd2yudYvZS2
>>> best regards,
>>> Chris
>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Thank you Chris for organizing this event and for reaching out to this
>>>> mailing list.
>>>> I feel there is strong interest from our community to participate on the
>>>> development of these new standards, and I know that there is ongoing work
>>>> towards this from some OSGeo members, so I am sure you will see some of us
>>>> in Ft Collins.
>>>> Let's make an OGC/WFS/STAC Catalog session during the Bonn Code Sprint: I
>>>> realized that the Orleans OGC TC meeting is on the same week as the Bonn
>>>> code sprint. Perhaps we could all join a video call session during that
>>>> week?
>>>> Best,
>>>> Angelos
>>>> On 02/13/2018 03:34 AM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hello OSGeo-ers!
>>>> I just wanted to make sure everyone knew about an event [1] I'm helping
>>>> organize, to bring together developers to give feedback on the evolving WFS
>>>> 3.0 specification. It's organized by Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), and
>>>> sponsored by USGS, but the goal is make it different than a typical OGC
>>>> event. Indeed the direct inspiration is the code sprints that OSGeo runs,
>>>> but to center it around a standard and give developers an opportunity to
>>>> actually code against the spec _before_ it becomes an official standard,
>>>> and to have any feedback incorporated.
>>>> I'm not sure if many people have been following the progress of WFS 3.0,
>>>> but it's been made more like how we build open source software, with an
>>>> open repository on github [2], and management of the spec through issues
>>>> and pull requests. And it's JSON and RESTful at the core, aiming to be much
>>>> easier to implement than existing OGC specs. For more backstory on it and
>>>> my take on its potential see my blog posts [3].
>>>> I'd love to see a number of OSGeo people come, it's on March 6 & 7th in Ft.
>>>> Collins, Colorado. Contributing I believe will help show OGC that there is
>>>> interest in the wider developer and open source world if they do things
>>>> differently, and help evolve how they create standards to be more
>>>> compatible with how developers work. I'm also organizing a day on March 8th
>>>> on SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog[4] [5], an open spec a group of us started
>>>> working on to search satellite imagery archives, that I'm hoping we can
>>>> align with the WFS specification. If you're interested in WFS and/or STAC
>>>> just email me and I can give you more details, or just fill out the form athttps://goo.gl/forms/RqQtNbfdEOHuLE272 - there are some limited travel
>>>> grants if that helps get there.
>>>> I know travel may be tough for those also going to Bonn, as the OSGeo
>>>> sprint there is two weeks later. I am figuring out if we will do a remote
>>>> participation option for Colorado, so email me if you're interested in
>>>> that. And Angelos had a great idea[6], of organizing a session on WFS/STAC
>>>> at Bonn, which I'd love to see. Drop me a line if you are attending the
>>>> OSGeo code sprint and interested in attending (or leading :) a session
>>>> there.
>>>> best regards,
>>>> Chris
>>>> [1]https://medium.com/@cholmes/wfs-3-0-and-spatiotemporal-asset-catalog-stac-in-person-collaboration-609e10d7f714
>>>> [2] https://github.com/opengeospatial/WFS_FES
>>>> [3] https://medium.com/tag/wfs-3/latest
>>>> [4] https://github.com/radiantearth/stac-spec/
>>>> [5] https://medium.com/tag/stac-spec/latest
>>>> [6] https://twitter.com/tzotsos/status/963081024187060225
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing listDiscuss at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>> --
>>>> Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
>>>> Charter Member
>>>> Open Source Geospatial Foundationhttp://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>> --
>> Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
>> Charter Member
>> Open Source Geospatial Foundation
>> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>> _______________________________________________
>> Standards mailing list
>> Standards at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Standards at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190503/83d1aebf/attachment.html>

More information about the Discuss mailing list