[OSGeo-Discuss] Is OSGeo presence on ${one-letter-asocial-media} still desirable?

Jody Garnett jody.garnett at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 09:38:41 PST 2025


We do not have an active volunteer to communicate on x. It is worth keeping
account to avoid someone else taking the OSGeo handle.

Marketting committee asked for help on Facebook, LinkedIn, Mastsdon, etc…
If you are active on anything it can be a great service to repost content
from our members as OSGeo to provide more reach.

Aside: For GeoServer [CVE-2024-36401](
https://geoserver.org/vulnerability/2024/09/12/cve-2024-36401.html) I
resorted to using twitter to get the word out due to urgency.

- -
Jody Garnett


On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 6:28 AM Even Rouault via Discuss <
discuss at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I no longer login on my account, so I'm not sure if OSGeo accounts are
> still in active use, but I still see them mentioned at
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/News_Queue#Twitter
>
> This could be a controversial subject, but it should rather not be, as
> the media and its owner have become I believe totally at odds with OSGeo
> values. I believe it would be appropriate for OSGeo to cease any
> activity if there's still any (I could understand they are kept inactive
> to avoid cyber squatting), and publicity, for that platform. At least we
> have done that as far as GDAL, PROJ and MapServer are concerned.
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end,
> this is just about bytes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20250112/686de6a2/attachment.htm>


More information about the Discuss mailing list