<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I agree wholeheartedly. It looks like the bottleneck was the
database. I’ve been privy to some MapServer tests done by testing teams over
several months and the result there was always deploying the data with long
update cycles to the middle tier disks instead of using the database. Only
then could the performance of the actual map servers be evaluated. Performance
shootouts/testing take time to do correctly as each run teaches you more and
more about how your deployment architecture affects the results.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Craig<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Geospatial Software Engineer<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://spatialminds.com/">Spatial Minds, LLC</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
discuss-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>antti roppola<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 23, 2009 7:34 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> OSGeo Discussions<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout
presentation/results<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>It was really interesting. The
very close results suggests to me that the bottlenecks were external to the WMS
and more related to external limitations like the ability to supply things like
I/O. It would be interesting to have profiling data on where the response time
was spent. For Mapserver it'd be a simple case of running Valgrinf and
KCacheGrind:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://kcachegrind.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/show.cgi/KcacheGrindIndex">http://kcachegrind.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/show.cgi/KcacheGrindIndex</a><br>
<br>
Case point. We had an in house app for crunching big raster and KCacheGrind
showed us that an external library was the biggest bottleneck.<br>
<br>
A.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Jeff McKenna <<a
href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>For those that did not make it to Sydney, here is the WMS
Performance<br>
Shootout presentation with results (GeoServer vs MapServer):<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout"
target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout</a><br>
<br>
MapServer: power users who manage MapServer sites with high loads/map draws
should<br>
take note of the results of MapServer CGI vs MapServer FastCGI, even in<br>
the case of Shapefiles and Rasters (yes, quite surprising).<br>
<br>
All: a lot of credit should go to Andrea Aime from GeoServer who worked very
hard in bringing the MapServer team up to speed to learn the testing process.
It was a great experience and we're already looking forward to next year.<br>
<br>
-jeff<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jeff McKenna<br>
FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services<br>
<a href="http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/" target="_blank">http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mapserver-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users"
target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jeff McKenna<br>
FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services<br>
<a href="http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/" target="_blank">http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>