<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Jovi Wrote<br>>(...) help me getting an overview and
comparison of some of the Servers such as MapServer, GeoServer and
Deegree.<br>
>what's the strength and
weakness of each server in some particular scenario<br>>I could never answer
these questions without ever using them, right? <br>
<br>I have exactly the same doubts, but for me, a beginer in webmaping, the report does not help much.<br><span id="result_box" class="short_text"><span style="background-color: rgb(235, 239, 249);" title="alguem poderia encarecidamente"><br>So, I kindly ask the comunity members for their personal opinion, to </span></span>point in a single line what is the strong and the week point of each of the servers.<br><br>For example:<br>- ServerX. good:Nice results in little time. Bad:Limited resources.<br><br><br>Regards, Pablo.<br><br><br><br>> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:23:30 -0700<br>> From: sstein@geo.uzh.ch<br>> To: seven@arnulf.us; discuss@lists.osgeo.org<br>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison<br>> CC: <br>> <br>> same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and <br>> nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email.<br>> <br>> Arnulf Christl (aka Seven) wrote:<br>> > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:<br>> >> Rafal Wawer ha scritto:<br>> >>> Hi Jovi,<br>> >>> For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS <br>> >>> project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too.<br>> >>> http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16 <br>> >>> <http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16><br>> >>> <br>> >>> The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the <br>> >>> evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and <br>> >>> compare FOSS4G software projects.<br>> >> I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer<br>> >> community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report<br>> >> (even for beginning 2008).<br>> >> For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project<br>> >> was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on.<br>> >><br>> >> Cheers<br>> >> Andrea<br>> > <br>> > Andrea, <br>> > I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This<br>> > is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed<br>> > by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type<br>> > of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why<br>> > OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously<br>> > a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well,<br>> > who will? <br>> > <br>> > Best regards, <br>> > Arnulf. <br>> > <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Discuss mailing list<br>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<br>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss<br> <br /><hr />Fique protegido enquanto navega na Internet. <a href='http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9707132' target='_new'>Instale o Internet Explorer 8.</a></body>
</html>