<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 5 Star OSGeo project maturity rating [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Jason / Cameron,<BR>
<BR>
>From the potential utiliser / implementer viewpoint:<BR>
<BR>
I’d like to think that any project that has graduated OSGeo Incubation could be considered a quality project with all of the vectors described by Andrea.<BR>
<BR>
This proposed rating system implies that this may not be the case.<BR>
<BR>
Comments?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Bruce<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 6/06/10 10:14 AM, "Jason Birch" <<a href="jason@jasonbirch.com">jason@jasonbirch.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Wow, I'm really having opinions this week :)<BR>
<BR>
IMHO getting into rating projects is just asking for trouble, infighting, bitterness, and people/projects walking away from OSGeo.<BR>
<BR>
Jason<BR>
<BR>
On 5 June 2010 16:37, Cameron Shorter wrote:<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Andrea and others, does this fit with people's expectations?<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>