<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
WFS 1.1.0 is indeed not saying anything on the order of axis
explicitly. And I think you can't find anything on axis order in WFS
1.1.0, since axis order is defined in the CRS definition (not by
WFS). So I'd say it is the other way around: why <i>not</i> respect
axis order? There is nothing in the WFS spec indicating that you are
allowed to neglect the definition of the CRS.<br>
<br>
So, assuming you are using a URN notation (for example
urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326), this implies that you are using the
axis order as defined by the CRS identified by that URN
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.epsg-registry.org">http://www.epsg-registry.org</a> and then "retrieve by code"). And
that's it. <br>
<br>
Thijs<br>
<br>
On 02/08/2012 11:33 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F324F74.30404@gmail.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
please, can anybody point me to the document and page, where it is
written, that WFS 1.1.0 should respect axis order of the coordinate
reference system? I really tried to find this out - no success.
Thanks
Jachym
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>