<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
hm, this is not my current interest, but I observe in passing that
the term "code of conduct" in OSGeo appears ...let's say... used by
some people with very focused interests. But as said, my concern
gets first, and to me it is secondary who acts as long as somebody
acts :)<br>
-Peter<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2015-09-18 12:22, Camille Acey
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAA94jw_+1ubPMA40b4Ti6eK4-A2OGF-=9FcVm2miAMeHiGgF=w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p dir="ltr">Issues relating to the reputation of the org should
be dealt with by the board or a legal committee. </p>
<p dir="ltr">We will soon begin discussion about CoC procedures
and pull together general guidance. In the interim, you can view
the wiki to find what the CoC committee is/is not.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 18, 2015 04:38, "Peter Baumann"
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Cameron,<br>
<br>
thank you for confirming the appropriateness of requesting a
correction.<br>
<br>
To me this is a serious issue of conduct - unless CoC
exclusively has been<br>
established to persecute gender issues, in which case (i) CoC
should be renamed<br>
and (ii) a general conduct observing any other conduct
violations (now with my<br>
hat as Charter Member on).<br>
<br>
Just to emphasize, this thread is not about incubation (yes, I
am less than<br>
happy about that too, but out of scope here).<br>
<br>
-Peter<br>
<br>
<br>
On 2015-09-17 23:21, Cameron Shorter wrote:<br>
> Hi Peter,<br>
> I think your request to have ownership of Rasdaman
"corrected" to be owned by<br>
> GmbH is reasonable, especially since the license of code
I assume shows<br>
> reference to GmbH? I also assume this could be confirmed
if someone were to<br>
> check the lineage of code commits?<br>
><br>
> I'd hope that this can be resolved without needing to
refer to the CoC<br>
> Committee, which would typically deal with cases such as
personal slander. I<br>
> realise that Jeff suggested this committee, but he also
suggested providing<br>
> more information - which would be required should this be
a CoC issue.<br>
><br>
> I'd be inclined to suspect this issue could be resolved
easily? I'd also<br>
> suspect that this is an accident rather than foul play by
someone? At the very<br>
> least, we should assume innocence until proven guilty of
any person involved.<br>
><br>
> With regards to reference to incubation of rasdaman. Last
correspondence on<br>
> this matter [1] has been that the incubation committee
members have provided<br>
> feedback and actions to address before rasdaman is ready
to be incubated. We<br>
> are waiting for such actions to be complete.<br>
><br>
> [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2015-April/002695.html"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2015-April/002695.html</a><br>
><br>
> On 18/09/2015 2:21 am, Peter Baumann wrote:<br>
>> Hello community,<br>
>><br>
>> here is another real case that I would like to raise.<br>
>><br>
>> rasdaman [0] is listed on OpenHub [1], like many of
us, with owner rasdaman GmbH<br>
>> set originally. By coincidence I found that OSGeo has
claimed rasdaman at some<br>
>> time in the past.<br>
>><br>
>> To my total surprise, as rasdaman is in incubation
since about 5 years now [2],<br>
>> and since quite some time OSGeo refuses graduation
requiring this and that extra<br>
>> documentation.<br>
>><br>
>> I find this undercover misappropriation a gross
violation of professional ethics<br>
>> and request to immediately "give back" the project as
a remedial action. I could<br>
>> do it myself, but recently OpenHub requires a phone
number to be entered to<br>
>> which, as blog comments show, spam will get sent. IMO
it is on OSGeo to bring<br>
>> this sacrifice.<br>
>><br>
>> Actually, I know who has "stolen ownership", but will
not disclose identity<br>
>> publicly following suggested practice.<br>
>><br>
>> Rather, I am seeking contact to and investigation by
the CoC Committee (or<br>
>> whoever is in charge).<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks,<br>
>> Peter<br>
>><br>
>> [0] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.rasdaman.org" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.rasdaman.org</a><br>
>> [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.openhub.net/p/rasdaman" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">https://www.openhub.net/p/rasdaman</a><br>
>> [2] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo</a><br>
>><br>
>> PS: On the side, this IMHO justifies an amendment of
the CoC rules to prevent<br>
>> such a case in future.<br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
Dr. Peter Baumann<br>
- Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann</a><br>
mail: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a><br>
tel: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B49-421-200-3178" value="+494212003178">+49-421-200-3178</a>,
fax: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B49-421-200-493178" value="+49421200493178">+49-421-200-493178</a><br>
- Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.rasdaman.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.rasdaman.com</a>, mail:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:baumann@rasdaman.com">baumann@rasdaman.com</a><br>
tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B49-173-5837882"
value="+491735837882">+49-173-5837882</a><br>
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola
incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei
reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi
parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="80">--
Dr. Peter Baumann
- Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann">www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann</a>
mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a>
tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
- Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.rasdaman.com">www.rasdaman.com</a>, mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:baumann@rasdaman.com">baumann@rasdaman.com</a>
tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)
</pre>
</body>
</html>