<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div>Dear Rasdaman Community members,</div><div><br></div><div>As per below, I proposed a 3 month period of time for the Rasdaman Community to reflect on the OSGeo Incubation discussion over the last two weeks and to decide how the Rasdaman Community wishes to proceed (or not) with OSGeo Incubation.</div><div><br></div><div>Peter Bauman has responded on your behalf that this time for reflection is not wanted. He would like OSGeo to make the decision now.</div><div><br></div><div>I will allow a three day period for comments from the Rasdaman Community before taking further action.</div><div><br></div><div>I would like to hear the view of Rasdaman Community members on this, so please respond. An email response to the Rasdaman Users list is all that is required.</div><div><br></div><div>Bruce Bannerman</div><div>OSGeo Mentor for the Rasdaman Project</div><div><br>On 8 May 2016, at 21:02, Peter Baumann <<a href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Allow me to respectfully disagree.<br>
<br>
rasdaman is leading technology due to rigorous science and excellent
engineering. This is what rasdaman users enjoy and what rasdaman
developers are proud of. Independent research shows that rasdaman is
much faster than Apache SPARK and other related technology. Today,
rasdaman databases exceed 100 TB in size in operational setups by
leading data centers, and we are going Petabyte now.<br>
<br>
Still, OSGeo wants us to replace this "design by innovation" by a
"design by committee" approach governed by a "dictatorship of
voting". (Note that the term "dictatorship" is not brought up by me,
but the provocative term has been used on us first by OSGeo in an
intense discussion preceding this mail).<br>
<br>
Disclaimer: TL;DR:<br>
<br>
Don't get me wrong, the team and myself will always listen to input,
and will discuss it openly. Decision will be solely based on
technical merits, and nothing else. In particular: no majority vote.
Yes, this obviously requires decent hardcore Computer Science
skills, and these do not come by vote. Feel invited to join the
party under these conditions, and you will find that we value genius
over committees.<br>
<br>
To add more background, rasdaman is now entering its seventh year of
incubation (for comparison: OSGeo has celebrated its 10th
anniversary). This gives a hint that OSGeo's own governance might be
worth reinvestigating. BTW, OSGeo has not passed its own incubation
rules and thinks this is not necessary.<br>
<br>
The rasdaman team has been working hard to accommodate OSGeo
requests, some of which indeed are useful for software quality,
undeniably. However, we cannot afford any longer to get distracted
from innovating rasdaman further, so there are no resources for
waiting a couple of months and then going the next iteration, like
the last 6 years.<br>
<br>
A brief summary of this history can be found here (annually updated
in some spare late-night moments): <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo">http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo</a> .<br>
<br>
Your annual OSGeo sprints are much acknowledged, Bruce, but we all
seem to agree that this story needs to converge, in one or the other
way: either to fundamentalistically focus on one specific niche
setup, or to broaden its perspective and accept that the world has
many colors... is Linux committee-driven? Drupal? Django? Ruby? Even
NASA has tried to explain OSGeo that their approach does not always
fly. <br>
<br>
OSGeo has had ample time to come to conclusions, it knows what
rasdaman is and how it works. Let us see whether (and when) OSGeo is
able to decide. Therefore, we will patiently await OSGeo's verdict,
accepting whatever its decision may be.<br>
<br>
Hope that clarifies,<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/06/2016 02:43 AM, Bruce Bannerman
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CAG=9HV++opj0AV68ZBS_-_1GVoqg9Fs4ceKrU8hp-VS6qDndTQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Dear Radaman Community and the OSGeo Incubation Committee,<br>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
I propose that we suspend a decision on the way forward with
Rasdaman Incubation for a period of three months.<br>
<br>
</div>
This will provide time:<br>
<ul>
<li>for all to reflect on incubation discussions events over
the last two weeks; and</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>for the Rasdaman Community to discuss and decide on the
way forward that they wish to take.</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Should the Rasdaman Community wish to continue with OSGeo
Incubation, then I will be happy to continue as OSGeo Mentor
for a short period of time to work through the Project
Governance approach with you. I will also be prepared to stand
aside, should you prefer an alternate mentor.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Should the Rasdaman Community decide that it does not wish to
continue with OSGeo Incubation, I am sure that you will be
encouraged to continue your association with OSGeo as an
"OSGeo Community Project" [1]. You will be able to do this
using your current Governance Process.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>We have come a long way over the last six years. I'm
impressed by how well the Rasdaman Community has developed and
by the processes and the functionality of the software
developed. Rasdaman has great potential in the future.<br>
</p>
<p>It is a credit to you all.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Bruce Bannerman</p>
<p>OSGeo Mentor to Rasdaman</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>[1] <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Community_Projects">https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Community_Projects</a>
<br>
</p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="80">--
Dr. Peter Baumann
- Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann">www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann</a>
mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:p.baumann@jacobs-university.de">p.baumann@jacobs-university.de</a>
tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
- Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.rasdaman.com">www.rasdaman.com</a>, mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:baumann@rasdaman.com">baumann@rasdaman.com</a>
tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)
</pre>
</div></blockquote></body></html>