<div dir="ltr">For the beta website we all have the same permissions, when this goes live I hope we can cut this down :)<div><br></div><div>Many of the standards did not make sense to me, but made sense to the geoserver-dev team (for example I had forgotten about web context service as implemented by deegree).</div><div><br></div><div>We should also have non OGC standards, like GeoTIFF and GeoJSON.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>--</div><div>Jody Garnett</div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 22 August 2017 at 10:07, Jeff McKenna <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com" target="_blank">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion. We should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards. But that is all my own opinion :) Then we can link to these standards. As of now anyone can create a 'standard' and post it on the beta site, seems very odd to me.<br>
<br>
Is my opinion here too strong? For now I chose just to edit the descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not.<br>
<br>
What do you prefer?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-jeff</font></span><span class=""><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:<br>
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make sense.<br>
<br>
Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Jody Garnett<br>
<br></span><span class="">
On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna <<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com" target="_blank">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com" target="_blank">jmckenna@gatewaygeomat<wbr>ics.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if<br>
you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as<br>
many of these are not actual standards) when you are editing your<br>
project page, please let me know and I will edit the new standard<br>
and add a description - I have just went through all of these<br>
"standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27 "standards". For example:<br>
<br>
(WPS)<br>
<br>
will now appear on the project pages as:<br>
<br>
Web Processing Service (WPS)<br>
<br>
This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users to our site.<br>
<br>
thanks all!<br>
<br>
-jeff<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></blockquote><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/discuss</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>