<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">I still dont understand why does pgRouting logo and many others have to lose the colors.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM nicolas bozon <<a href="mailto:nicolas.bozon@gmail.com">nicolas.bozon@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>I have updated the OSGeo symbols set according to your feedbacks.</div><div><br></div><div>Updated Preview:</div><div><a href="https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/" target="_blank">https://nbozon.github.io/OSGeo/symbols-set/</a> </div><div><br></div><div>Updated material:</div><div><a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206/commits/d4cf2ebc76e34293333953980a38dd047d3003a7" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/pull/206/commits/d4cf2ebc76e34293333953980a38dd047d3003a7</a> </div><div><br></div><div>Basic changelog:</div><div><br></div><div>- Removed every symbols considered as non-compliant to our brand guidelines</div><div>- Removed the Get-It project logo which is not a community project at all</div><div>- Corrected PostGIS and PgRouting elephant logos (so a bit less scalable now)</div><div>- Corrected mapfish and pywps logos (added missing text)</div><div>- Renamed live to osgeolive</div><div><br></div><div>As nothing that may considered as non compliant to our guidelines remains, and that the first batch of community feedbacks have been taken into account, may i suggest that the OSGeo symbols set could now be pulled into the branding repo ?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance for any comment</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Nick</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 00:30, Jody Garnett <<a href="mailto:jody.garnett@gmail.com" target="_blank">jody.garnett@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi Jody,<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Thank you for your constructive feedbacks.</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">I am a bit confused on this one - part of the point of having our mark was to use it everywhere on all the OSGeo things.</div></div></blockquote><div>Our mark is our beloved compass, and these variations on the compass are meant to represent all the OSGeo things :)</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div> I get your point here, but i think these symbols could be great to help differenciate the many facets of OSGeo. </div><div>Imagine a new comer that could for example identify each of our activity very clearly. I think that symbols might help him to</div><div>understand the foundation and find his way, with always the compass shape in mind of course :) </div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I understand, and indeed I assumed we would go with the sub brand approach myself. As such I am not the best person to do the pros/cons between the ideas :)</div><div><br></div><div>This is a case where I love your work, and want to double check our strategy.<br></div><div><br></div><div>The style guide is here: <a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/marketing/branding</a></div><div><br></div><div>The summary has: </div><div><br></div><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><i>Logos are as provided for OSGeo and sub-brands (all of which include the unalterned OSGeo mark). Distinct brands (such as GeoForAll and OSGeo Live) maintain their own mark.</i><i><br></i><i>While logos have been produced with Miriam Libre Bold and Sintony Regular the resulting shapes have been reduced to outlines for use on systems that do not have the correct fonts available. A template has been provided for the generation of additional sub-brand logos.</i></blockquote><div> </div></div><div>aside: We really need this converted to html for our website.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>You are right, and i think Boundless did a great elephant design on the old OpenGeo Suite, so i got inspired :)<br></div><div><div>Slonik is a lovely but very detailed SVG, so difficult to integrate in such a symbol set. That's why i decided to use a simpler one.</div><div>I will try to modify it before the PostGIS folks complain :)</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>Chance for collaboration rather than complaints, I think everyone can see the design limitation.</div><div><br></div><div>Our OSGeo compass outline does not "quite" work, since there is not much room for the project identify inside. I think we had sub branding as a priority we would of done it a little bit different.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>- get-it just added themselves to the website wrong and have not yet asked to be a community project? I am trying to confirm now ...</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Whoa, my bad, sorry ! i didn't know one could become a Community Project so easily :)</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We like projects to ask, the code and project is reviewed on the incubation list, etc..</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Yes, please confirm with the Incubation Committee about their application. I see you already removed it from the website so i will remove it from the set.</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah I may of messed up there, trying to figure it out. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>- Loader is being added (it is approved but still has a draft web page)</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Good point, will plan to integrate the Loader logo, but i can't find it by now :( </div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>To be honest I do not think they have a logo. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>- GC2/Vidi was just added yesterday</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>Yes, and the Mapcentia logo is already in the set. I understand both GC2 and Vidi use the same logotype right ?</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah and that is the logo of the company so ... not the best logo for the project? Actually if you wanted to stop by the incubation list we could talk to the projects directly.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>Thanks again and talk soon</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Indeed! </div><div>Jody <br></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><pre>Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44,
81739 München, Germany
Vicky Vergara
Operations Research
eMail: vicky@<a href="http://georepublic.de" target="_blank">georepublic.de</a>
Web: <a href="https://georepublic.info" target="_blank">https://georepublic.info</a>
Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl
<span></span></pre></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>