[OSGeo-Edu] Re: Superficial review of copyright issues related to collection and publication of education material on OSGeo Website

Simon Cropper scropper at botanicusaustralia.com.au
Tue Aug 3 03:19:57 EDT 2010


Attached is an email responding to my copyright review published on the [Aust-
NZ] forum.

> My personal opinion is that homeopathic attribution is a potential
> snowball for derivatives like mash-ups.
> 
> Have a search for "the obnoxious BSD advertising clause" to see how
> mandatory attribution can go awry.
> 
> IMHO, attribution needs greater care and thought when the product is
> more likely to remain identifiable in a chain of derivatives.
> 
> Loss of attribution would probably be a "reasonableness" test. That is,
> I don't think you can set rules for this up-front and expect to cover
> every likely derivative product. At some point borrowing ceaes to be
> fair use.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antti
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aust-nz-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:aust-nz-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of John Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 2010 4:40 PM
> To: scropper at botanicusaustralia.com.au
> Cc: Robert Coup; aust-nz at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [Aust-NZ] Superficial review of copyright issues related to
> collection and publication of education material on OSGeo Website(LINK)
> 
> On 3 August 2010 16:21, Simon Cropper
> 
> <scropper at botanicusaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > Makes me wonder though, in a textural non-exact document, how much
> > changes would a needed to trigger the loss of attribution or
> > conversely how much
> 
> I don't think you can ever forgo attribution by just making changes,
> because you are deriving from their original information.
> 
> > change would the original author accept before they were willing to
> > forgo attribution.
> 
> This would be up to individual authors.
> 
> 
> ------
> IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments have been issued by the
> Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
> (DAFF).  The material transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient
> only and may contain confidential, legally privileged, copyright or
> personal information.  You should not copy, use or disclose it without
> authorisation from DAFF.  It is your responsibility to check any
> attachments for viruses and defects before opening or forwarding them.
> 
> If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender of this
> email at once by return email and then delete both messages.  Unintended
> recipients must not copy, use, disclose, rely on or publish this email or
> attachments.  DAFF is not liable for any loss or damage resulting from
> unauthorised use or dissemination of, or any reliance on, this email or
> attachments.
> 
> If you have received this e-mail as part of a valid mailing list and no
> longer want to receive a message such as this one, advise the sender by
> return e-mail accordingly.
> 
> This notice should not be deleted or altered.
> 
> 
> ------

-- 
Cheers Simon

	Simon Cropper
	Botanicus Australia Pty Ltd
	PO Box 160 Sunshine 3020
	P: 03 9311 5822. M: 041 830 3437
	W: http://www.botanicusaustralia.com.au


More information about the Edu_discuss mailing list