[El] GDAL 1.7.3 in elgis-testing

[Mathieu Baudier]

Hi Viji, Ralph,

should I merge the two spec files (the one from Ralph with imageio-ext
and the one from Viji for Fedora) or do we want to have the
imageio-ext stuff first merged into the Fedora spec file?

I can always merge the two (and probably soon will) and that won't be
too hard to synchronize with Fedora later on.
I just wanted to check again.

Cheers,

Mathieu

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:25, Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier at argeo.org> wrote:
> This spec file does not contain the imageio-ext build done by Ralph.
>
> See:
> https://projects.argeo.org/elgis/svn/factory/trunk/rpmbuild/elgis/gdal/SPECS/gdal.spec?r=121
> for the current version.
>
> Are these imageio parts specific to EL5, or should they also be
> reported to Fedora?
>
> There is no hurry to answer/solve this. GDAL proper is currently
> usable in testing.
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:00, Viji V Nair <viji at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> sorry, missed the attachment.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Viji
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier at argeo.org> wrote:
>>>>> ANOTHER option would be to package the poms and depmap frags into an
>>>>> additional subpackage "gdal-java-poms" or "gdal-java-maven2", sort of
>>>>> "If you want to use gdal-java properly with maven2, you should install
>>>>> gdal-java-maven2, which of course requires maven2". That would be clean.
>>>>
>>>> I like this.
>>>> If there is a clean way and the only cost is just another small
>>>> package, I find it worth the (little) effort.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But then that would not be a subpackage, but rather a full-fledged
>>> package in elgis-plus.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> el mailing list
>>> el at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el
>>>
>>
>