Fwd: [El] GDAL 1.7.3 in elgis-testing

Mathieu Baudier mbaudier at argeo.org
Thu Dec 9 05:18:42 EST 2010 

FYI


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Viji V Nair <viji at fedoraproject.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 20:52
Subject: Re: [El] GDAL 1.7.3 in elgis-testing
To: Ralph Apel <r.apel at r-apel.de>, Mathieu Baudier <mbaudier at argeo.org>


Hi Mathieu,

Please find the attached "testing" version of GDAL 1.7.3 with imageio
extension support and maven2 depmaps (maven2 is not available for el5)

This should work perfectly fine on:

RHEL/EPEL 5
RHEL/EPLE 6
Fedora 12/13/14/15

Please test this for EL5 and let me know the result. If you face any issues

In case if the test fails on EL5, I would appreciate if you can
provide access to a RHEL 5 test machine for sometime so that I can
test and resolve all the issues in one shot.

Thanks
Viji



On 12/7/10, Viji V Nair <viji at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> HI Ralf
>
> Thank you so much
>
> Will work on and publish the final versions for ELGIS, EPEL6 and Fedora
> ASAP
>
> Thanks
> VIji
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Ralph Apel <r.apel at r-apel.de> wrote:
>> We now have
>>
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/SRPMS/gdal-1.7.3-1.jpp6.src.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-devel-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-static-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-python-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-perl-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-ruby-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-java-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-iioext-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> Wrote: /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-debuginfo-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>>
>> I moved the poms and depmap frags to the main package.
>> $ rpm -qlp /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm | more
>> /etc/maven/fragments/gdal
>> ...
>> /usr/share/maven2/poms/JPP-gdal.pom
>> /usr/share/maven2/poms/JPP-imageio-ext-gdal-bindings.pom
>>
>> The -java subpackage contains a .jar, a set of .so, as well as the
>> examples.
>>
>> $ rpm -qlp /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-java-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> /usr/lib/libgdalconstjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libgdalconstjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libgdalconstjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/lib/libgdaljni.so
>> /usr/lib/libgdaljni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libgdaljni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/lib/libogrjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libogrjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libogrjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/lib/libosrjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libosrjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libosrjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/share/doc/gdal-java-1.7.3
>> /usr/share/doc/gdal-java-1.7.3/apps
>> /usr/share/doc/gdal-java-1.7.3/apps/GDALOverviews.java
>> ...
>> /usr/share/doc/gdal-java-1.7.3/apps/ogrinfo.java
>> /usr/share/java/gdal-1.7.3.jar
>> /usr/share/java/gdal.jar
>>
>> The subpackage I called -iioext only holds a .jar and a set of .so,
>> named differently and also patched at the System.loadLibrary level.
>>
>> $ rpm -qlp /build/builddir/RPMS/i686/gdal-iioext-1.7.3-1.jpp6.i686.rpm
>> /usr/lib/libgdalconstiioextjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libgdalconstiioextjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libgdalconstiioextjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/lib/libgdaliioextjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libgdaliioextjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libgdaliioextjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/lib/libogriioextjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libogriioextjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libogriioextjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/lib/libosriioextjni.so
>> /usr/lib/libosriioextjni.so.1
>> /usr/lib/libosriioextjni.so.1.14.3
>> /usr/share/java/imageio-ext-gdal-bindings-1.7.3.jar
>> /usr/share/java/imageio-ext-gdal-bindings.jar
>>
>> Attaching a SRPM with the large tarballs replaced by zero byte dummies.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 02:12 +0530, Viji V Nair wrote:
>>> Hi Ralf
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Apel <r.apel at r-apel.de> wrote:
>>> > Yes, I'll do. Please confirm the alternative sonames for the iioext
>>> > patched stuff.
>>>
>>> As you mentioned earlier please include the "iioext" to the current
>>> name.
>>>
>>> libgdaliioextjni.$(SO_EXT)
>>>
>>> Will keep the extension as it is, only the name change.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Viji
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 01:55 +0530, Viji V Nair wrote:
>>> >> Hi Ralf
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Ralph Apel <r.apel at r-apel.de> wrote:
>>> >> > AFAIK and remember, geoserver requires geotools which requires
>>> >> > imageio-ext which in turn will require its own patched version of
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > gdal java binding.
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes, its a chain. Thank you so much for the remainder.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can we stick on the separate package gdal-java-imageio? Would it be
>>> >> possible for you to find some time and patch the classes with new
>>> >> sonames?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >> Viji
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 01:36 +0530, Viji V Nair wrote:
>>> >> >> Hi
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Mathieu Baudier
>>> >> >> <mbaudier at argeo.org> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> we would need to decide whether to have only one soname
>>> >> >> >>> pointing either
>>> >> >> >>> to the "normal" or to the iioext "real" file or to have
>>> >> >> >>> different
>>> >> >> >>> sonames (in different packages, of course +1). If we use
>>> >> >> >>> differing
>>> >> >> >>> sonames, the iomageio-ext classes will have to be patched to
>>> >> >> >>> look for
>>> >> >> >>> that differing .so
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> I would suggest different sonames in different package. This
>>> >> >> >> will be
>>> >> >> >> safer and we can have a separate package.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Mathieu, what do u think?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I don't have much experience with JNI packaging but this indeed
>>> >> >> > seems safer.
>>> >> >> > I think that this very unlikely that people would use both at the
>>> >> >> > same time.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > The question also is: which one would have as a dependency a
>>> >> >> > package
>>> >> >> > like, say, geoserver?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Requires: gdal-java-imageio
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Ralf, what do you say?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Event though the one without imageio-ext is "purer", esp. from a
>>> >> >> > FLOSS
>>> >> >> > point of view, most people would probably aim at the best
>>> >> >> > performances.
>>> >> >> > That is were the alternatives mechanism would be handy.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > As Ralph suggested, let's try and test.
>>> >> >> > An important part of the test would be to make sure that there is
>>> >> >> > no
>>> >> >> > side-effect on non-java stuff so that we can push GDAL 1.7.3 to
>>> >> >> > stable
>>> >> >> > quickly (that fact that we are doing this work now is independent
>>> >> >> > from
>>> >> >> > this maintenance release, so it should not be kept "hostage").
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> There wont be any side effects to other non java stuffs, should
>>> >> >> work
>>> >> >> properly as we are not even touching that part. I am almost
>>> >> >> finished
>>> >> >> with the new spec, just thinking about the best way to pack the
>>> >> >> imgeio
>>> >> >> jnis so that we can enter into the testing phase.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Many thanks to you both for your patience!
>>> >> >> > I'm very excited to see a proper packaging for GIS Java apps
>>> >> >> > around
>>> >> >> > the corner...
>>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> > el mailing list
>>> >> >> > el at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >> >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks
>>> >> >> Viji
>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> >> el mailing list
>>> >> >> el at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/el
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gdal173.tar.bz2
Type: application/x-bzip2
Size: 18421 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/el/attachments/20101209/3fabc818/gdal173.tar-0001.bz2

More information about the el mailing list