GDAL 1.7.3 / Java software and repos (was Re: [El] imageio-ext)
Mathieu Baudier
mbaudier at argeo.org
Thu Nov 25 05:28:44 EST 2010
> Yes, gdal-java can be split off.
But is it a must?
> But the names of the native shared libs expected by the Java components
> are equal for unpatched gdal-java and for the patched one.
What are the differences between patched and un-patched gdal-java?
(I'm sure you wrote it before, but I kind of lost track)
What do we lose if we only use patched gdal-java?
Sorry, I feel a bit dumb, but I really want to have clarified
everything before staring to merge...
More information about the el
mailing list