[fdo-dev] Namespace

[Traian Stanev]

Hi Mateusz,
 
FDO already uses a short prefix to class names to accomplish the same effect. All Fdo core classes use Fdo as prefix to class names for example, while for example classes in the SDF provider use the Sdf prefix. What would namespaces add to that, apart from more complexity?
 
Traian
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Mateusz Loskot [mailto:mateusz at loskot.net] 
	Sent: Sat 8/12/2006 6:19 PM 
	To: dev at fdo.osgeo.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [fdo-dev] Namespace
	
	

	Hi,
	
	I have a short question,
	I wonder what is the rationale behind not using C++ namespaces in FDO
	source code? I believe this would help to make the code modularized and
	easier to grasp and maintain.
	
	Best regards
	--
	Mateusz Loskot
	http://mateusz.loskot.net
	
	---------------------------------------------------------------------
	To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at fdo.osgeo.org
	For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at fdo.osgeo.org
	
	

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4062 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20060812/a6944e03/attachment.bin