[fdo-dev] Namespace

Traian Stanev traian.stanev at autodesk.com
Sat Aug 12 19:01:30 EDT 2006

Hi Mateusz,
FDO already uses a short prefix to class names to accomplish the same effect. All Fdo core classes use Fdo as prefix to class names for example, while for example classes in the SDF provider use the Sdf prefix. What would namespaces add to that, apart from more complexity?

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Mateusz Loskot [mailto:mateusz at loskot.net] 
	Sent: Sat 8/12/2006 6:19 PM 
	To: dev at fdo.osgeo.org 
	Subject: [fdo-dev] Namespace

	I have a short question,
	I wonder what is the rationale behind not using C++ namespaces in FDO
	source code? I believe this would help to make the code modularized and
	easier to grasp and maintain.
	Best regards
	Mateusz Loskot
	To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at fdo.osgeo.org
	For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at fdo.osgeo.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4062 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20060812/a6944e03/attachment.bin

More information about the Fdo-internals mailing list