[fdo-dev] fdo and fdocore

[Mateusz Loskot]

Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> 
>> I tried to run the UnitTest but it failed.
>> Here is the last message:
>>
>> F.........................................
>> UnitTestUtil.cpp:47:Assertion
>> Test name: 7XmlTest.testXsl
>> �p���y�p���z�p���<���(�p����l����p���C�(�p���r�z�(2
>>
>>
>> Failures !!!
>> Run: 99   Failure total: 1   Failures: 1   Errors: 0
>>
>>
>> Note, the strange characters above, something like binary output.
>>
>> Do I need to do any configuration for the UnitTest?
>>
>> [GB] So, only 1 test failed? No setup should be required. I will retry
>> the unit tests and see if I can reproduce.
> 
> Greg / Mateusz,
> 
> I tried UnitTest for the core api, and got:
> 
> warmerda at gdal2200[218]% ./UnitTest
> ..
> In-memory limited conversion to unaligned FGF Polygons, retained as FGF...
> 0.023135 sec for 14915 positions in 343 polygons (14826 geom/s)
> 
> In-memory use of limited retained, unaligned FGF, accessed via streamed
> geometries...
> 0.111158 sec for 304095 positions in 7000 streamed geometries (62973
> geom/s)
> ............................Filter = ( Width*Length ) AS Area, Area = 123
> ............................ERROR (XSL Processor): 'xsl:variable' has an
> invalid 'junk' attribute, at URI 's���8��8ˁƔʰ  ����' (line 1, column 225)
> WARNING (XSL Processor): At source node '#document/DataSet', '' is an
> illegal element name. The element will not be added, at URI 's��d�'
> (line 1, column 299)
> .........................................
> OK (99)
> warmerda at gdal2200[219]%
> 
> No *apparent* failures, but I don't get the same sort of summary report
> that Mateusz saw.

Frank,

As we've hold over the FDO tasks then I'm not eager to dig into FDO
UnitTest at the moment.
As I wrote in my reply to Greg's post, I'll be back to it when we're
back to FDO.
Frank, is this a good plan?

Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net