[fdo-dev] Classes and properties in SHP providers

Traian Stanev traian.stanev at autodesk.com
Wed Nov 1 09:44:48 EST 2006

Not if things deteriorate to such a point that one has to handle as many
cases as there are providers. There would be no point to FDO in such a
case. So we have to be careful about how many capabilities we add. We
don't want to be another DirectX (although 10 years on they are finally
removing capabilities checking from the DirectX 10 API to ship with



-----Original Message-----
From: Mateusz Loskot [mailto:mateusz at loskot.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:42 AM
To: dev at fdo.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-dev] Classes and properties in SHP providers

Dan Stoica wrote:
>> Currently, I've not discovered any better way of development of FDO
> generic utils than checking for capabilities and react properly.
> Checking the capabilities is a natural approach. It's just like 
> writing multi-platform code.


Yes, exactly.

Mateusz Loskot

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at fdo.osgeo.org For additional
commands, e-mail: dev-help at fdo.osgeo.org

More information about the Fdo-internals mailing list