[fdo-dev] Empty subversion logs

[Romica Dascalescu]

Mateusz,

On subversion you have different repositories for fdocore and each
provider.
When you create an artifact you create this artifact on fdo, the base
project not on each repository.
So when you submit some changes which affect more than one repository
you must submit more than one time.

Romy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mateusz Loskot [mailto:mateusz at loskot.net] 
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:38 PM
To: dev at fdo.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-dev] Empty subversion logs

Romica Dascalescu wrote:
> Hi Mateusz,
> 
> You can not drop some changes in the same time if the changes are in
> different locations:
> E.g.: if you modify a file from fdocore and one from SHP all these
files
> are part of the change, but you can not drop them in only one step.
> You must do two drops first for fdocore and second from shp.

But here I see 4 separate commits into the same repository, fdordbms:
https://fdo.osgeo.org/servlets/Scarab/id/FDO133

What different locations you mean?

I still can not understand the idea behind.
Are you saying this is the solution to synchronize fixes and
changes applied to 2 separate repositories?
AFAIK:
1. Every repository lives its own life and manages its own
history of changes.
2. I'm not sure how it's common to have the same fix for core component
(fdocore) and satellite driver (fdo provider). I'm 99% sure change
submitted to the core are different than changes submitted to the
driver, even if both changesets apply to the same bug report.
IOW, both changesets are exclusive.

> Why should we put two descriptions if these files are for the same fix
(artifact)?

IMO, to make it possible to track what kind of changes every
Subversion revision has introduced into the repository.

I run svn log and here is a part of log output.
How can get a clue what revisions should I compare?
For example, if I need to investigate latest changes after
'svn update' broke my sandbox and I'm not able to compile it anymore.
Should I compare with r158, with r155 or with r156?

...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r160 | danstoica | 2006-08-26 18:53:45 +0200 (Sat, 26 Aug 2006) | 1 line

FDO136
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r159 | barbarazoladek | 2006-08-25 17:48:43 +0200 (Fri, 25 Aug 2006) | 1
line

FDO133
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r158 | barbarazoladek | 2006-08-25 15:53:59 +0200 (Fri, 25 Aug 2006) | 1
line

FDO133
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r157 | barbarazoladek | 2006-08-25 14:58:12 +0200 (Fri, 25 Aug 2006) | 1
line

FDO133
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r156 | barbarazoladek | 2006-08-25 14:38:33 +0200 (Fri, 25 Aug 2006) | 1
line

FDO133
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r155 | gavincramer | 2006-08-24 21:12:12 +0200 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) | 1
line

FDO134
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r154 | barbarazoladek | 2006-08-24 03:59:00 +0200 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) | 1
line
...

> When you drop something in addition you will put a description.
> See https://fdo.osgeo.org/servlets/Scarab?id=FDO159 with my last drop.

Do you mean the "FDO159 - Linux part" message?
OK.


Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at fdo.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at fdo.osgeo.org