[fdo-internals] MOTION to accept RFC

[Robert Bray]

I'll go +1 (Bob). I agree the classification may not be the best, but it 
seems from reading this the classification can be enhanced over time 
without really breaking anything. I also think that self descriptive 
functionality like this is required in order to support a good provider 
agnostic UI for building expressions.

Bob

Jason Birch wrote:
> +0 Jason
>  
> Generally in favour
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Greg Boone
> Sent: Wed 2007-08-01 12:27 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] MOTION to accept RFC 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
>  
> 
> In response to Thomas Knoell's RFC posting, and the subsequent community feedback and discussions, I would like to formally motion to adopt FDO RFC 5 http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc5.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals