[fdo-internals] New RFC posted

[Haris Kurtagic]

Is there any specific reason for that ?

 

 Haris

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:40 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

 

Spatial functions will be handled separately.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Original Message -----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
To: FDO Internals Mail List <fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Fri Aug 03 17:35:42 2007
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

I’ve noticed there is no any Spatial Functions. What is a reason for that?



Thank you,

Haris



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Knoell
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Hi,



A new RFC (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc8) has been posted. The RFC addresses the enhancement of the FDO well known (expression) function list to include additional, commonly used functions.



Please review the RFC. Any comments/suggestions and questions are welcome. All feedback is expected by the end-of-day August 10th 2007. If no changes are required it is my intent to motion that a vote for the acceptance of the RFC be made and subsequently voted on by the PSC.



Thanks



  Thomas




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20070803/950b1447/attachment-0001.html