[fdo-internals] MOTION to adopt RFC 8 - Modify Fdo APIFdoFunctionDefinition

[Haris Kurtagic]

+1

Haris

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:28 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] MOTION to adopt RFC 8 - Modify Fdo
APIFdoFunctionDefinition

 

Hi All,

 

In response to Thomas Knoell's RFC posting, and the subsequent community
feedback and discussions, I would like to formally motion to adopt FDO
RFC 8: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc8
<http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc8> .

 

+1           Greg Boone

 

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Knoell
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:31 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted

 

Hi,

 

RFC 8 (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc8) has been updated as per
comments received. In addition, I updated the document RFC
Attachment.doc that is attached to the RFC. I also created a
corresponding PDF version of it (RFC Attachment.pdf). Therefore, please
disregard the RFC attachment ExpressionFunctionSignatures.pdf.

 

Please review the RFC and provide feedback by end of day tomorrow
(Friday, August 24th). If no changes are required it is my intent to
motion that a vote for the acceptance of the RFC be made and
subsequently voted on by the PSC.

 

Thanks

 

  Thomas

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20070829/a97d99a8/attachment-0001.html