[fdo-internals] subversion branches

Robert Bray rbray at robertbray.net
Thu Feb 22 14:35:15 EST 2007

I am strongly in favour of removing the defunct trunks and branches. 
Getting rid of them makes the bad situation easier to understand and 
lessens the potential for something getting checked into the wrong place.


Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Greg Boone wrote:
>> Frank's analysis is correct. 
>> The trunks of the following repositories are no longer used
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdocore
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/sdf
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/shp
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/wfs
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/wms
>> etc...
>> As for removing the trunks of the subversions listed above, is there any
>> drawbacks to doing so? I would like feedback on this by other PSC
>> members.
> Thanks Greg for the confirmation!
> +1 for removal motion
>> As well, the 3.2.0 and 3.2.x branches of the newly merged fdo repository
>> are misleading and no longer required. I am in favour or removing them. 
> +1 too
> Cheers

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list