[fdo-internals] subversion branches

Greg Boone greg.boone at autodesk.com
Thu Feb 22 14:39:24 EST 2007


I will take of removing the unused branches/trunks.


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] subversion branches

I am strongly in favour of removing the defunct trunks and branches. 
Getting rid of them makes the bad situation easier to understand and 
lessens the potential for something getting checked into the wrong


Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Greg Boone wrote:
>> Frank's analysis is correct. 
>> The trunks of the following repositories are no longer used
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdocore
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/sdf
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/shp
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/wfs
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/wms
>> etc...
>> As for removing the trunks of the subversions listed above, is there
>> drawbacks to doing so? I would like feedback on this by other PSC
>> members.
> Thanks Greg for the confirmation!
> +1 for removal motion
>> As well, the 3.2.0 and 3.2.x branches of the newly merged fdo
>> are misleading and no longer required. I am in favour or removing
> +1 too
> Cheers
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list