[fdo-internals] 64bit related changes for 3.2.x?

[Greg Boone]

I have no problems with this port. The code looks ok.

Jack, can you also take a look?

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:55 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] 64bit related changes for 3.2.x? 

Folks,

I'm interested in applying the following 3 changesets back to 3.2.x
branch
in Fdo/Unmanaged/Src.

   http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/changeset/2514
   http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/changeset/2513
   http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/changeset/2512

They are all that is required for 64bit support in the FDO core, and I
think
they are all small, understandable and safe.   How do folks feel about
this?
I realize 64bit support in 3.2.x is not of any substantial priority.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo,
http://osgeo.org

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals