[fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

[Greg Boone]

By including tools under fdo we force the tools to remain in sync and
use the same versioning scheme. I think this would make our lives a lot
less complicated. Having fdotools outside of fdo only introduces
complications regarding which version of fdo they apply to.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 4:06 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] PSC: Interesting Conundrum

Unless fdotools is going to be released in the same versioning scheme as

fdo, I would not recommend this, I would recommend two trees in the same

repository.

/fdo/trunk/
/fdo/tags
/fdo/branches

/fdotools/trunk
/fdotools/tags
/fdotools/branches

Mateusz Loskot wrote:

> So, there is the 'fdo' module that holds everything what makes FDO.
> Next, if reasonable, we could add 'fdotools' module this way:
> 
> - trunk
> -- fdo
> -- fdotools


-- 

   Paul Ramsey
   Refractions Research
   http://www.refractions.net
   pramsey at refractions.net
   Phone: 250-383-3022
   Cell: 250-885-0632
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals