[fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

[Jason Birch]

Does that mean that we have to re-organise SVN again? :)

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Traian Stanev
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

I agree with that. Each provider should have its own version number.


-----Original Message-----
From: Haris Kurtagic
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] fdogdal <Bounds> support for 3.2.x

I think it is very important to get latest GDAL included into MapGuide
1.2, even if it means new FDO version or delay for MapGuide 1.2.

BTW:
In current process changes in provider are tied to version change of FDO
even FDO itself hasn't been changed.
If some provider has improvements I don't see it as a new version of
FDO.
I am thinking if it would be better that providers has its own
version's.