[fdo-internals] Motion: RFC 3 - PostGIS provider

[Robert Bray]

+1 (Bob). I do agree with Orest though, this provider should support 
basic transactions.

Bob

Jason Birch wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This RFC appears to have gained acceptance (or at least ambivalence)
> so...
> 
> I move to accept RFC3: PostGIS Provider
> 
> Please vote within 48 hours.  My motion automatically counts as a +1
> vote. (if it's seconded).
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 00:21
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] RFC 3: PostGIS provider
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Can you please have a look at and comment on RFC3?
> 
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc3
> 
> I can't remember if we agreed that it could be added to SVN & Trac (new
> component) ahead of acceptance of the RFC.  We'd be grateful if it could
> :)  At this point we are at risk of losing bug reports in initial
> testing.
> 
> I'll send the location of the current alpha binaries and some basic
> instructions to the list in a separate email.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>