[fdo-internals] #fdo is not registered

Jason Birch Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca
Mon May 28 17:29:20 EDT 2007

I think it should be a motion, based on the guidelines on the Freenode

Should probably discuss first:

I agree with Mateusz that it would be a good idea for the FDO project to
have an official relationship with FreeNode, ensuring that the #fdo
channel stays under our control.  Does anyone object or have questions
about this?  If there's no negative feedback within a couple days, I'll
forward a motion.


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 14:10
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] #fdo is not registered

Jason Birch wrote:
> I have a feeling that CIABot created it in its most recent
> Can we just kill off the CIABot for a day, and then just recreate the 
> channel?


yes, we've already cleaned this task, i believe.

> Is there some kind of command to run to register the channel less 
> formally than through group registration?  I do agree that going 
> through the GCF process is a good idea.  Would you like to be the 
> contact for FDO?  If not, I'll volunteer.  Either way, I'll put
forward a motion.

Sure, if there are no objections about my person for GCF contact, I
don't mind either.

Do you want me to submit GCF for FDO?
Should we discuss it withing PSC, or vote?

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list