[fdo-internals] Request for Agenda Items for FDO PSC Meeting

Greg Boone greg.boone at autodesk.com
Wed Oct 17 13:27:52 EDT 2007

There is one WMS RFC that I need to write and would like to have
incorporated into 3.3.0. I will be looking into this week and reporting
back to the community in short order. Other than that, I see no other
RFC's or structural changes required for this release. That being said,
I would like to enhance the PostGIS, OGR and King* Provider build
processes so that they can be built using the same mechanisms and
processes as the other FDO Providers in the trunk. This can be done
after the beta and before the final 3.3.0 release. 

Finally, I do see 3.3.1 as being a bug fix release. It is not intended
to contain new features. 


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Warmerdam (External)
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:38 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] Request for Agenda Items for FDO PSC

Greg Boone wrote:
> My current thoughts are to release the current contents of the FDO
> as an FDO 3.3.0 alpha/beta in late October. This would be followed by
> official release of FDO (3.3.0) in November for MapGuide, and a patch 
> level release of FDO (3.3.1) early next year for Autodesk.
> Thoughts and/or feedback? Are there other release requirements 
> originating from other clients of FDO?


The above sounds fine to me assuming we have completed all the
changes in FDO that will be needed for the 3.3 series.  That is, I
3.3.1 and so on would just be bug fixes releases, right?  Not
new features?

Best regards,
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo,

fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list