[fdo-internals] Futures: SLD support

[Greg Boone]

Ok, I see the issue now... Yes, the schema should be:

<xs:simpleType name="RemoteOwsType">
    [...snip...]
    <xs:restriction base="xs:token">
        <xs:enumeration value="Default"/>
        <xs:enumeration value="WFS"/>
        <xs:enumeration value="WCS"/>
    </xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>



-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 12:51 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Futures: SLD support

What's a cut-out? :)

The C++ example shows:

enum FdoWmsOvRemoteOwsType {

    FdoWmsOvRemoteOwsType_Default = 0,  /// Default (Unknown)
    FdoWmsOvRemoteOwsType_WFS,          /// Remote Web Feature Server
    FdoWmsOvRemoteOwsType_WCS           /// Remote Web Coverage Server
};

The schema example shows:

<xs:simpleType name="RemoteOwsType">
    [...snip...]
    <xs:restriction base="xs:token">
        <xs:enumeration value="Default"/>
        <xs:enumeration value="WFS"/>
        <xs:enumeration value="WMS"/>
    </xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>

There's a difference (WCS vs WMS), no?  The description in the text says
"The presently allowed values are WFS and WMS though more may be allowed
in the future", so I'm guessing that the C++ example is incorrect?

Jason
 

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 09:45
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Futures: SLD support

I am not sure I follow.... Can you send me a cut-out of the issue?

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:48 AM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [fdo-internals] Futures: SLD support

Quick question on the SLD futures document...  There seems to be some
confusion on the FdoWmsOvRemoteWMS C++ API.  The description says that
WFS and WMS are the allowed types, and the .xsd shows WFS and WMS, but
the C++ API example shows WFS and WCS.  Is the C++ example incorrect?
 
In general these futures documents are pretty straightforward, though
it's taking a while for me to get through them all :)  
 
Jason
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals