[fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

[Badreddine Karoui]

Regardless of the terminology; these two providers persist their data to an SQLite file. The idea would be to upgrade the SDF provider to write SQLite complaint data blocks that can be consumed by other SQLite tools/applications. At the same time the SDF provider maintains its backward compatibility to its current format. We get a seemless transition to the new format and stability since the bulk of the SDF provider code will be re-used. Also, since the SDF will continue to bypass the SQLite virtual machine, the performance will not be degraded at least not by much.

Badreddine

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:44 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite


The RFC does not propose "enhancements". It proposes a new format.


Traian



> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:32 AM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
>
> Maybe this question comes a bit too late, but why can't the
> enhancements proposed in the RFC be made in the existing SDF provider
> as opposed to building a whole new provider?
>
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Haris Kurtagic
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:29 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
>
> +1
> Haris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 7:51 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
>
> Given the modifications to the RFC to address questions raised on this
> list, and a lack of further discussion I hereby move to approve FDO RFC
> 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite.
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc16
>
> +1 from me
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Traian Stanev
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
>
> I think it has enough stuff in it to vote on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1350 - Release Date:
> 3/30/2008 12:32 PM
>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals