[fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

[Jason Birch]

Yeah, you're too late :)

For me the most important part of this RFC is the creation of a format
that is single file, open, and can be easily shared between open source
applications.  This includes things like being able to take advantage of
standard SQL queries, etc.

The current SDF format is not documented, and it is my (possibly
mistaken) understanding that it uses an FDO structure for metadata
rather than the OGC SFSQL metadata tables.  Maybe I'm confusing provider
with format here, but if the SDF provider is reading non-SDF files... ?

If the SDF provider was re-purposed for this non-SDF format, would it
still be able to handle native SQLite queries?  Would it be able to
achieve the raw speed that was (I think) Traian's main motivation for
pursuing this provider?  Would it allow SelectOrdering and
SelectGrouping? (OK, that last one was gratuitous - but it's a pain
point for me)

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 08:32
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

Maybe this question comes a bit too late, but why can't the enhancements
proposed in the RFC be made in the existing SDF provider as opposed to
building a whole new provider?

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Haris
Kurtagic
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:29 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

+1
Haris

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 7:51 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

Given the modifications to the RFC to address questions raised on this
list, and a lack of further discussion I hereby move to approve FDO RFC
16 - FDO Provider for SQLite.

https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc16

+1 from me

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Traian Stanev
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

I think it has enough stuff in it to vote on.

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1350 - Release Date:
3/30/2008 12:32 PM

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals