[fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Thu Apr 3 11:39:39 EDT 2008
Personally, I would like to see additional deliberation on this issue before it is formally adopted.
While the ideas expressed in the RFC are interesting and have merit, I do not believe we have fully addressed the proposed future roadmaps for the SDF and SQLite providers and how they are to be positioned and supported within the FDO community. Also, I do not believe we have fully explored all the possibilities of taking the SDF code stream and functionality and moving it to meet the objectives outlined in RFC 16.
The fact that we only have 3 votes so far, speaks to these facts.
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:27 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
We seem to have hit a bit of a wall on this vote. The 48 hour deadline
has gone by with three +1's and no further votes. There has been
considerable discussion, but it appears to have come to a standstill.
At this point, the motion has technically passed, but I really don't
feel comfortable declaring this result without some guidance. Thoughts?
From: Jason Birch
Subject: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite
Given the modifications to the RFC to address questions raised on this
list, and a lack of further discussion I hereby move to approve FDO RFC
16 - FDO Provider for SQLite.
+1 from me
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the fdo-internals