[fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

[Orest Halustchak]

Hi,

My preference would have been to investigate in more detail the possibility of enhancing the SDF provider. However, based on the specific scope of the rfc and usefulness to the community, my vote is:

+1.

Thanks and sorry for the delay.

Orest.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:22 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

Based on the technical merits of the RFC, and the positive feedback provided by the community, I support the adoption of the RFC.

+1

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:51 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] Vote: FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

Given the modifications to the RFC to address questions raised on this
list, and a lack of further discussion I hereby move to approve FDO RFC
16 - FDO Provider for SQLite.

https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc16

+1 from me

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Traian Stanev
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite

I think it has enough stuff in it to vote on.

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals