[fdo-internals] RE: FDO OSGeo PostGIS Provider

[Jason Birch]

And Frank closed it J

 

Apparently the easiest way of doing this would be to create a special
branch for this (just the 3.2 PostGIS provider) in the main repository.
It could be removed when the 3.2 repositories are retired.

 

Jason

 

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 14:42
To: FDO Internals Mail List; Bruno Scott
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO OSGeo PostGIS Provider

 

Oh, that was pretty lame of me.  I forgot that the SQL Spatial provider
was based on the generic framework.

 

I put in a Trac ticket for the SVN repository:

 

https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/242

 

Jason

 

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 14:19
To: FDO Internals Mail List; Bruno Scott
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO OSGeo PostGIS Provider

 

At this time, SQL Server Spatial for 3.2.x is submitted and built from
the http://svn.osgeo.org/fdordbms/branches/3.2.x
<http://svn.osgeo.org/fdordbms/branches/3.2.x>   repository. I would
really like it that we put the PostGIS 3.2.x code somewhere central so
that is can be maintained and accessed by the community.

 

Based on previous patches and PostGIS involvement, I will add Bruno as a
contributor.

 

Greg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20080404/a7b574d1/attachment.html