[fdo-internals] RFC 25 for Review

[Orest Halustchak]

Yes, it looks pretty good.

I have a couple of questions.

Is there a reason that basic transactions are not supported (SupportsTransactions: : false)?

Are there any plans to support more expression functions such as the list from RFC8 (standard functions) and RFC11 (geometry functions)?

By the way, the link below seems to point to the rfc23 page. Here is the rfc25 page: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc25


Thanks,
Orest.

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 10:33 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] RFC 25 for Review

Looks OK.

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Simon Pelicon
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 10:11 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RFC 25 for Review

Hi,

RFC 25 (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc25<http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc23>) has been posted.
This RFC proposes FDO provider for the Informix Spatial DataBlade Module
Please review the proposal and reply.
Thanks
Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20080829/7b683ee7/attachment.html