[fdo-internals] MOTION: RFC29: Redefining Expression FunctionEXTRACT

[Orest Halustchak]

+1

Orest.

------Original Message------
From: Jason Birch
To: FDO Internals Mail List
ReplyTo: FDO Internals Mail List
Sent: Dec 2, 2008 5:49 PM
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] MOTION: RFC29: Redefining Expression       FunctionEXTRACT

+1 Jason



Fine by me, though I still find the naming of the function a bit unintuitive J



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 08:36
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] MOTION: RFC29: Redefining Expression FunctionEXTRACT



Hi All,



I would like to motion that RFC 29: “Redefining Expression Function EXTRACT” be adopted.



+1

Greg



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Knoell
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:01 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Hi Jason,



The proposed solution is close to the signature we currently support for the expression function Extract. It also is in-line with other functions where we accept an identifier from an enumeration to avoid having multiple functions that just differ in the kind of information it returns. But if the consensus in this discussion is to have functions for each of the date/time properties, then the RFC could be adopted.



Thanks



  Thomas



From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:52 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] New RFC posted



Interesting…



Would there

------Original Message Truncated------


--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld