[fdo-internals] RE: Updated FDO RFC 23 For Review
Greg Boone
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Thu Jul 17 12:36:59 EDT 2008
At this time, there is no plan to make implementing DescribeClasses mandatory. Providers who wish to implement this command can do so and advertise that fact in their capabilities.
I just wanted to point out that by implementing this command we have no plans to deprecate DescribeSchema. DescribeSchema and DescribeClasses are intended to both be available for use.
Greg
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Steve Dang
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:32 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: Updated FDO RFC 23 For Review
1. Under the DescribeClasses section, "SetFeatureClassNames" should be read as "SetClassNames".
2. Any chance will the DescribeClasses API become a mandatory implementation for all the providers in the future (i.e. when the DescribeSchema API gets deprecated)?
Thanks,
Steve.
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Ronnie Louie
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:39 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: [fdo-internals] Updated FDO RFC 23 For Review
RFC 23 (http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc23) has been updated and re-posted for review. In particular, the previously proposed changes to DescribeSchema have been dropped, and replaced with a new DescribeClasses command. Also the API command names for enumerating schemas and classes have been updated to GetSchemaNames and GetClassNames.
Please review the new proposal and reply to this list by July 23.
Thanks
Ronnie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20080717/3e15ee94/attachment.html
More information about the fdo-internals
mailing list