[fdo-internals] RFC 27 - Passed

[Jackie Ng]

That was a rhetorical question made as a response.

I've made my intentions clear in the RFC that I am happy for FDO Toolbox to
live inside the main FDO project.

- Jackie


Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> 
> 
> Jackie,
> 
> I'd strongly like to encourage Maestro and FDO Toolbox to be treated as
> part of the regular FDO Trac.  It gets messy to have many Trac instances
> from a management and "finding your bugs" point of view.  The toolbox and
> Maestro can have their own components, and might be released on their
> own schedule for now, but would hopefully become more closely linked to
> FDO releases over time.
> 
> (IMHO)
> 
> I would not be willing to volunteer to create additional Trac instances
> for
> FDO sub-projects.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/RFC-27-for-review-tp1343797p1482608.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.