[mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions

[Greg Boone]

Yes, for FDO.

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:43 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions


You mean for FDO?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:41 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
> 
> I am not against the separated development paths, but is there a reason why
> the detailed exception code cannot go into the trunk?
> 
> Greg
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:33 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List; FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
> 
> 
> Yes, we will have to drop the same part of the MapGuide RFC. As far as I
> know (I checked in Aleck's patch for RFC 79 yesterday), only the native
> error code is implemented in MapGuide as well.
> 
> Traian
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-
> internals-
> > bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:29 AM
> > To: FDO Internals Mail List; MapGuide Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: [fdo-internals] A note about
> > implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed Exceptions
> >
> > Hi Orest,
> >
> > There is a corresponding MapGuide RFC to expose the Detailed Fdo
> Exceptions
> > through the MapGuide API http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc79.
> > This work is being done by Autodesk.  I do not know if there will be an
> > impact on the MapGuide feature if the detailed exceptions are not exposed.
> >
> > I am cross posting to the MapGuide Internals list for clarification from
> the
> > implementers of the MapGuide RFC.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-
> > bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
> > Sent: August 25, 2009 6:46 AM
> > To: FDO Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [fdo-internals] A note about implementation of RFC 37 - Detailed
> > Exceptions
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding FDO RFC 37: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc37
> >
> > The native error code part of this RFC will be done for FDO 3.5, but the
> > additional detailed exceptions will be done for the release after this.
> Let
> > me know if that will be a problem for anyone.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Orest.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals