[fdo-internals] MOTION: FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider
greg.boone at autodesk.com
Tue Dec 15 22:48:25 EST 2009
I think we are still trying to determine the best name to use. I like PostGISDB, but.... I am open to comments and opinions.
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:50 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] MOTION: FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider
Did mike's name change suggestion get accepted? I liked it...
I'm +0 on this.
On 2009-12-15, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> There were are no further comments on RFC 45:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider.
> I would like to motion a vote to accept this RFC.
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Orest Halustchak
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:47 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider
> As per recent email discussions, here is the RFC for the new FDO PostGIS
> provider: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc45
> Please provide additional feedback.
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the fdo-internals