PostGIS discussion - non-critical to vote. Was Re: [fdo-internals] MOTION: FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider

Orest Halustchak orest.halustchak at autodesk.com
Wed Dec 16 08:41:31 EST 2009


I like the name postgresql as well, with the provider name being OSGeo.PostgreSQL.	

I can treat that as a friendly amendment to the RFC and update it later today unless I hear comments / objections one way or another.

What version? This should work with PostGIS 1.4.0 / Postgres 8.4.1 and PostGIS 1.3.5 / Postgres 8.3.7.

Thanks,
Orest.

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: PostGIS discussion - non-critical to vote. Was Re: [fdo-internals] MOTION: FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider

Well, that's a dangerous thing to say around here :)

I like postgresql because it will seem more natural if the other
provider is retired. DB at the end isn't consistent with any of the
other rdbms providers.

On a not-especially-important tack, any idea what version of
PostGIS/PostgreSQL this will be targeted to?

Jason

On 2009-12-15, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com> wrote:
> I think we are still trying to determine the best name to use. I like
> PostGISDB, but.... I am open to comments and opinions.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:50 PM
> To: FDO Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] MOTION: FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS
> provider
>
> Did mike's name change suggestion get accepted? I liked it...
>
> I'm +0 on this.
>
> Jason
>
> On 2009-12-15, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There were are no further comments on RFC 45:
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc45  - Add new FDO PostGIS provider.
>>
>> I would like to motion a vote to accept this RFC.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Greg.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Orest
>> Halustchak
>> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:47 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO RFC 45 - Add new FDO PostGIS provider
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per recent email discussions, here is the RFC for the new FDO PostGIS
>> provider: http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc45
>>
>> Please provide additional feedback.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Orest.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals


More information about the fdo-internals mailing list