[fdo-internals] SQLite Provider issue

Jason Birch Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca
Thu Jun 4 13:16:45 EDT 2009

By binary compatibility, do you mean that the compiled 3rd party dll wouldn't be readable by the SDF provider, or that generated SDF files wouldn't be readable by older SDF providers?

Would there be any way for 3.5 to standardise on a single (modified) SQLite library shared between both SDF and the SQLite provider?  That would at least get us down to one non-vanilla SQLite dependency.


-----Original Message-----
From: Badreddine Karoui
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:04 AM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] SQLite Provider issue

The thirdparty SQLite library is an older version needed by the SDF provider. The SDF provider needs the older version for binary compatibility reason since the latest version used by the SQLite provider is not backward compatible to the version used by the SDF provider.


More information about the fdo-internals mailing list