[fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2 -- KingOra Version

[Crispin_at_1Spatial]

>> 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 already include direct SDE support.

I guess I was just thinking the two issues you describe on your site (NULL
metadata and connection type) could be as partial individual file
submissions.

If we could get RFC 42 to be assigned a guide and voted on I don't mind the
submission to trunk - notwithstanding the two small(?) outstanding
I think the assignment/approval/voting timeline may prohibit this.

And, strictly RFC42 is a new feature that should not come in at the RC build
level.

 Crispin

 

Haris Kurtagic wrote:
> 
> 
> 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 already include direct SDE support.
> So if I submit it will be together with changes for direct SDE RFC. 
> I can do that ?
> 
> Haris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Crispin_at_1Spatial
> Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 10:47 AM
> To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2 -- KingOra Version
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I notice that the last KingOra submission looks like it ties in with KO
> 0.8.8
> http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html
> http://www.sl-king.com/fdooracle/fdooracle.html 
> 
> There have been a couple of KO releases since then - Haris, is it possible
> to get the 0.8.9 and 0.8.10 changes in to 3.4.1 before the final release
> so
> there is a consistent version between the OSGeo builds downloads on
> SL-King?
> 
> 
> 
> Greg Boone wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> FDO 3.4.1 RC2 has been posted to
>> 
>> http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-341-downloads
>> 
>> Please take a look and if there are issue, let me know.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:17 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> At current the build release process is not fully automated. I may not
>> have the cycles to produce a build for the next week or so.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Chris
>> Erickson
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:00 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> Is there a fundamental reason why?  We may build the fdo provider and go
>> with RC1 on our own, but would like to know if there are big underlying
>> problems...
>> 
>> [cid:image001.png at 01CA5ECC.EF304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>> 
>> chris erickson
>> developer
>> chris at cartopac.com<mailto:chris at cartopac.com>
>> 970.493.9500 x 191
>> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:14 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> The second RC has been delayed. I have no ETA on the release of the RC at
>> this time.
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Chris
>> Erickson
>> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:35 AM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> Is there any update on the timeline for RC2?
>> 
>> [cid:image001.png at 01CA5ECC.EF304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>> 
>> chris erickson
>> developer
>> chris at cartopac.com<mailto:chris at cartopac.com>
>> 970.493.9500 x 191
>> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:39 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> Yes, It will contain that fix. ETA is towards the end of the week.
>> Thursday or Friday depends on requests for additional changes.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Chris
>> Erickson
>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:35 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> Does RC2 contain the long text field fixes in ArcSDE?  Do you know when
>> it
>> might be posted?
>> 
>> [cid:image001.png at 01CA5ECC.EF304DA0]<http://www.cartopac.com/>
>> 
>> chris erickson
>> developer
>> chris at cartopac.com<mailto:chris at cartopac.com>
>> 970.493.9500 x 191
>> 970.482.1485 (fax)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 2:32 PM
>> To: FDO Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [fdo-internals] FDO 3.4.1 RC2
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I am considering releasing FDO 3.4.1 RC2 later this week. Are there any
>> outstanding defects that have been resolved in trunk that need porting
>> back to 3.4.1? Are there any show-stopper issues that remain in 3.4.1
>> before the next release candidate is published?
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> fdo-internals mailing list
>> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3967609.html
> Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-internals mailing list
> fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/FDO-3-4-1-RC2-tp3771453p3967933.html
Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.